03880nam 2200709Ia 450 991097416320332120251116205631.09786612437250978030914706403091470699781282437258128243725997803091417410309141745(CKB)2560000000007925(EBL)3378549(SSID)ssj0000342231(PQKBManifestationID)11277124(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000342231(PQKBWorkID)10285964(PQKB)11219145(Au-PeEL)EBL3378549(CaPaEBR)ebr10355547(CaONFJC)MIL243725(OCoLC)923281033(MiAaPQ)EBC3378549(Perlego)4734089(BIP)27528211(EXLCZ)99256000000000792520091201d2009 ua 0engurcn|||||||||txtccrReengineering the survey of income and program participation /Panel on the Census Bureau's Reengineered Survey of Income and Program Participation ; Constance F. Citro and John Karl Scholz, editors ; Committee on National Statistics ; Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education ; National Research Council1st ed.Washington, D.C. National Academy Pressc20091 online resource (189 p.)Description based upon print version of record.9780309141734 0309141737 Includes bibliographical references.""Front Matter""; ""Acknowledgments""; ""Contents""; ""Summary""; ""1 Introduction""; ""2 SIPP's History, Strengths, and Weaknesses""; ""3 Expanded Use of Administrative Records""; ""4 Innovation in Design and Data Collection""; ""Appendix A: SIPP Data Quality""; ""Appendix B: Biographical Sketches of Panel Members and Staff""; ""References""; ""Committee on National Statistics ""Beginning in 2006, the Census Bureau embarked on a program to reengineer the Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP) to reduce its costs and improve data quality and timeliness. The Bureau also requested the National Academies to consider the advantages and disadvantages of strategies for linking administrative records and survey data, taking account of the accessibility of relevant administrative records, the operational feasibility of linking, the quality and usefulness of the linked data, and the ability to provide access to the linked data while protecting the confidentiality of individual respondents. In response, this volume first examines the history of SIPP and reviews the survey's purpose, value, strengths, and weaknesses. The book examines alternative uses of administrative records in a reengineered SIPP and, finally, considers innovations in SIPP design and data collection, including the proposed use of annual interviews with an event history calendar. Household surveysUnited StatesMethodologyEvaluationIncomeUnited StatesStatistical servicesEvaluationSocial surveysUnited StatesMethodologyEvaluationHousehold surveysMethodologyEvaluation.IncomeStatistical servicesEvaluation.Social surveysMethodologyEvaluation.339.2Citro Constance F(Constance Forbes),1942-1804879Scholz John Karl1808754National Research Council (U.S.).Committee on National Statistics.MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910974163203321Reengineering the survey of income and program participation4359189UNINA