03988nam 2200757Ia 450 991097212110332120200520144314.097866129334559781282933453128293345097803133807920313380791(CKB)2550000000019753(OCoLC)693771795(CaPaEBR)ebrary10437182(SSID)ssj0000413610(PQKBManifestationID)12147688(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000413610(PQKBWorkID)10384484(PQKB)10803588(Au-PeEL)EBL617140(CaPaEBR)ebr10437182(CaONFJC)MIL293345(MiAaPQ)EBC617140(Perlego)4169101(EXLCZ)99255000000001975320100608d2010 uy 0engurcn|||||||||txtccrThe case for combat how presidents persuade Americans to go to war /Edward J. Lordan1st ed.Santa Barbara, Calif. Praegerc20101 online resource (335 p.) Bibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph9780313380785 0313380783 Includes bibliographical references and index.Presidential war rhetoric : an overview -- The War of 1812 (1812-1815) -- The Mexican-American War (1846-1848) -- The Civil War (1861-1865) -- The Spanish-American War (1898) -- World War I (1914-1918) -- World War II (1941-1945) -- The Korean War (1950-1953) -- The Vietnam War (1964-1973) -- The Persian Gulf War (1991) -- The War on Terror (2001-?) -- Conclusions.This book provides a historical analysis of presidential rhetoric regarding war and examines the similarities, differences, effectiveness, and ethics of the persuasive strategies used by the White House through the history of the nation. In the United States, the decision to use military force typically is made by the president, even though it is actually Congress that has the authority to commit the nation to war. It is also the president's job to inform the American people when that decision has been made-and to attempt to convince the citizens to support their government in the decision to go to war. The book traces the development of the rhetoric used by presidents to convince Americans to go to war, from the earliest days of the nation to the latest conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq. After an overview of the governmental issues related to committing to combat, the author evaluates presidential speeches over the course of ten American conflicts to determine how effective-and ethical-presidents have been in communicating with various publics. Taking neither a pro- nor antiwar stance, this text focuses entirely on the period leading up to the announcement of a formal conflict. Communication in politicsUnited StatesHistoryMass mediaPolitical aspectsUnited StatesHistoryPolitical oratoryUnited StatesHistoryPolitics and warUnited StatesHistoryPresidentsUnited StatesHistoryPresidentsUnited StatesLanguageHistoryRhetoricPolitical aspectsUnited StatesHistoryUnited StatesHistory, MilitaryCommunication in politicsHistory.Mass mediaPolitical aspectsHistory.Political oratoryHistory.Politics and warHistory.PresidentsHistory.PresidentsLanguageHistory.RhetoricPolitical aspectsHistory.973.09/9Lordan Edward J1810327MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910972121103321The case for combat4361633UNINA