05275oam 22010454 450 991097123250332120250426110106.09781475581874147558187497814755392331475539231(CKB)2670000000278858(EBL)1606830(SSID)ssj0000939843(PQKBManifestationID)11600599(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000939843(PQKBWorkID)10946523(PQKB)11050121(MiAaPQ)EBC1606830(Au-PeEL)EBL1606830(CaPaEBR)ebr10627079(OCoLC)870244976(IMF)WPIEE2012173(IMF)WPIEA2012173WPIEA2012173(EXLCZ)99267000000027885820020129d2012 uf 0engur|n|---|||||txtccrPublic Expenditure in the Slovak Republic : Composition and Technical Efficiency /Francesco Grigoli1st ed.Washington, D.C. :International Monetary Fund,2012.1 online resource (35 p.)IMF Working PapersDescription based upon print version of record.9781475507089 1475507089 9781475505214 1475505213 Includes bibliographical references.Cover; Abstract; Contents; I. Introduction; II. Literature Review: An EU-OECD Perspective; III. Features of the Slovak Republic's Public Expenditure; Figures; 1. Government Size across EU-OECD Countries; 2. Slovak Government Size; 3. Public Spending During the Crisis; A. Public Expenditure Composition; 4. Expenditure Composition, 2009; 5. Expenditure Composition in Real Terms; 6. Expenditure Categories; B. Spending Agencies; Tables; 1. Uncommitted Expenditures; 2. Public Expenditure by Agency, 2009; IV. Technical Efficiency; A. Education; 7. Education Expenditure across EU-OECD countries8. Education Expenditure3. Selected Indicators of the Education System; 9. Efficiency of Education Expenditure; B. Health; 10. Health Expenditure across EU-OECD countries; 11. Health Expenditure; 4. Selected Indicators of the Health System; 12. Efficiency of Health Expenditure-Life Expectancy; 13. Efficiency of Health Expenditure-Infant Mortality; V. Concluding Remarks; Appendices; 1. The DEA Approach; Appendix Figures; 1. DEA Production Possibility Frontier; ReferencesGood practice suggests that budget allocations should reflect spending priorities and that spending should provide cost-effective delivery of public goods and services. This paper analyzes the composition of public expenditure in the Slovak Republic. It also assesses the relative efficiency of spending in education and health. The Slovak Republic spends more on social benefits and less on wages compared to the EU and OECD average. While it manages to translate the low expenditures into outcomes in an efficient manner in the education sector, this is not true for health. Moreover, the recent increases in expenditure levels have not improved outcomes, suggesting that significant budgetary savings could be achieved through increases in efficiency.IMF Working Papers; Working Paper ;No. 2012/173Government spending policySlovakiaEducation spendingimfEducationimfEducation: GeneralimfEnvironmental Taxes and SubsidiesimfExpenditureimfExpenditures, PublicimfHealth care spendingimfNational Government Expenditures and EducationimfNational Government Expenditures and HealthimfNational Government Expenditures and Related Policies: GeneralimfPublic finance & taxationimfPublic FinanceimfRedistributive EffectsimfSocial Security and Public PensionsimfTaxation and Subsidies: ExternalitiesimfTotal expendituresimfSlovakiaAppropriations and expendituresSlovak RepublicimfGovernment spending policyEducation spendingEducationEducation: GeneralEnvironmental Taxes and SubsidiesExpenditureExpenditures, PublicHealth care spendingNational Government Expenditures and EducationNational Government Expenditures and HealthNational Government Expenditures and Related Policies: GeneralPublic finance & taxationPublic FinanceRedistributive EffectsSocial Security and Public PensionsTaxation and Subsidies: ExternalitiesTotal expenditures332.1/52Grigoli Francesco1127643DcWaIMFBOOK9910971232503321Public Expenditure in the Slovak Republic4372638UNINA