03867nam 2200673 a 450 991097101190332120200520144314.097866121600119781282160019128216001X9789027294838902729483610.1075/slcs.57(CKB)1000000000550497(OCoLC)70773677(CaPaEBR)ebrary10073630(SSID)ssj0000278072(PQKBManifestationID)11240475(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000278072(PQKBWorkID)10242326(PQKB)10079030(MiAaPQ)EBC622328(DE-B1597)720842(DE-B1597)9789027294838(EXLCZ)99100000000055049720010627d2001 uy 0engurcnu||||||||txtccrCommunicative organization in natural language the semantic-communicative structure of sentences /Igor Melcuk1st ed.Amsterdam ;Philadelphia J. Benjaminsc20011 online resource (408 p.) Studies in language companion series,0165-7763 ;v. 57Bibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph9781588111012 1588111016 9789027230607 9027230609 Includes bibliographical references (p. [366]-380) and indexes.Communicative Organization in Natural Language -- Editorial page -- Title page -- LCC data -- Contents -- Introduction: Six Basic Questions Answered -- Chapter I. General Characterization of the Semantic-Communicative Structure of Sentences -- Chapter II. Basic Categories of Semantic-Communicative Structure -- Chapter III. Sem-Comm-Oppositions: Linguistic Comments and Illustrations -- Bibliography -- Subject Index -- Name Index -- Language Index -- The STUDIES IN LANGUAGE COMPANION SERIES (SLCS).The book defines the concept of Semantic-Communicative Structure [= Sem-CommS]-a formal object that is imposed on the starting Semantic Structure [= SemS] of a sentence (under text synthesis) in order to turn the selected meaning into a linguistic message. The Sem-CommS is a system of eight logically independent oppositions: 1. Thematicity (Rheme vs. Theme), 2. Givenness (Given vs. Old), 3. Focalization (Focalized vs. Non-Focalized), 4. Perspective (Foregrounded vs. Backgrounded), 5. Emphasis (Emphasized vs. Non-Emphasized), 6. Presupposedness (Presupposed vs. Non-Presupposed), 7. Unitariness (Unitary vs. Articulated), 8. Locutionality (Communicated vs. Signaled). The values of these oppositions mark particular subnetworks of the starting SemS and thus allow for the distinction between sentences such as (a) A man killed a dog vs. The dog was killed by a man, (b) John washed the window vs. It was John who washed the window or (c) It hurts! vs. Ouch! The proposed Sem-Comm-oppositions are conceived as an attempt at sharpening the well-known notions of Topic ~ Comment, Focus, etc. Possible linguistic strategies for expressing the values of the Sem-Comm-oppositions in different languages are discussed at some length, with linguistic illustrations.Studies in language companion series ;v. 57.Observatory of meaning text linguisticsGrammar, Comparative and generalSentencesSemanticsGrammar, Comparative and generalSentences.Semantics.401/.43Melcuk Igor A(Igor Aleksandrovic),1932-304072MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910971011903321Communicative organization in natural language4346162UNINA