05403nam 2200709Ia 450 991082488370332120200520144314.09786611318482978128131848012813184859780470690512047069051897804706802300470680237(CKB)1000000000411250(EBL)350909(SSID)ssj0000287953(PQKBManifestationID)11207955(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000287953(PQKBWorkID)10371975(PQKB)11560722(Au-PeEL)EBL350909(CaPaEBR)ebr10233204(CaONFJC)MIL131848(FINmELB)ELB178595(OCoLC)214281306(MiAaPQ)EBC350909(Perlego)2750414(EXLCZ)99100000000041125020001204d2001 uy 0engur|n|---|||||txtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierAdjudication in construction disputes /John Redmond1st ed.Oxford ;Malden, MA Blackwell Science20011 online resource (274 pages)Includes index.9780632056514 0632056517 ADJUDICATION in Construction Contracts; Contents; Preface; Chapter 1 Introduction; 1.1 Background to the legislation; 1.2 Adjudication in standard contracts before the Act; 1.3 What is adjudication?; 1.4 Appeal and review; 1.5 Who are the adjudicators?; 1.6 The future; Chapter 2 Construction Contracts and Construction Operations; 2.1 Definition of 'construction operations'; 2.2 Exclusions from the definition of 'construction operations'; 2.3 Definition of 'construction contract'; 2.4 Exclusions from the definition of 'construction contracts'; 2.5 The mixed contract2.6 Limits of date and place; 2.7 Residential occupiers; 2.8 Contracts in writing; Chapter 3 The Statutory Right to Refer Disputes to Adjudication; 3.1 Definition of dispute; 3.2 Required contractual provisions; 3.3 The incorporation of institutional rules and other terms; 3.4 The adjudication provisions of the Scheme for Construction Contracts; Chapter 4 Starting Adjudication; 4.1 Timing; 4.2 The notice of adjudication; 4.3 Service of the notice of adjudication; 4.4 Identification or selection of the adjudicator; 4.5 Request to an adjudicator nominating body4.6 Terms of agreement with the adjudicator; 4.7 Procedure if the appointment system fails; 4.8 Objections to specific adjudicator; 4.9 Revocation of appointment and resignation of the adjudicator; Chapter 5 Preliminary Matters - the Referral Notice and Jurisdiction; 5.1 Time for delivery of the referral notice; 5.2 Form and contents of the referral notice; 5.3 Related and unrelated disputes; 5.4 Questions of jurisdiction; Chapter 6 Conduct of the Adjudication; 6.1 Overriding duties of the adjudicator; 6.2 The exercise of initiative by the adjudicator; 6.3 Failure to comply6.4 Representation of the parties; 6.5 Confidentiality; 6.6 Timetable for decision; 6.7 Standard forms of appointment; Chapter 7 The Adjudicator's Decision; 7.1 The duty to decide; 7.2 The matters in dispute; 7.3 Power to open up certificates etc.; 7.4 Decision on payments; 7.5 Interest; 7.6 Form and content of the decision; 7.7 Binding nature of the decision; 7.8 Mistakes; 7.9 Adjudicator's immunity; Chapter 8 Costs; 8.1 Adjudicator's right to fees and the power to apportion; 8.2 Right to require security for his fees; 8.3 Power to order payment of costs; Chapter 9 Enforcement9.1 The Act and the Scheme; 9.2 Application for summary judgment; 9.3 Other enforcement procedures; 9.4 Challenges to enforcement; Chapter 10 Payment; 10.1 Introduction; 10.2 The right to stage payments; 10.3 Timing and quantification of payments; 10.4 Notice of amount to be paid; 10.5 Notice of intention to withhold payment; 10.6 Right to suspend; 10.7 Conditional payment provisions; 10.8 The Scheme; Appendix 1 Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996; Appendix 2 The Scheme for Construction Contracts (England and Wales) Regulations 1998; Table of Cases; References to Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996Adjudication was introduced in construction contracts as a requirement of the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act in 1998 to tackle the large number of disputes which dog most projects. Provisions for adjudication are now included in all standard construction forms and are implied into all construction contracts that do not expressly include them. When adjudication was first launched there were enormous uncertainties about how it would work in practice, and books published to coincide with the launch could only speculate on this.Construction contractsGreat BritainArbitration and awardGreat BritainConstruction contractsArbitration and award343.41/078624343.41078624Redmond JohnB.A.948057MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910824883703321Adjudication in construction disputes2142921UNINA05396oam 22014054 450 991096991940332120250426110526.09786613822574978146231348814623134859781452778402145277840X9781282589926128258992X97814519087701451908776(CKB)3360000000443292(EBL)3014492(SSID)ssj0000940036(PQKBManifestationID)11576137(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000940036(PQKBWorkID)10939166(PQKB)10466364(OCoLC)694141175(IMF)WPIEE2006082(MiAaPQ)EBC3014492(IMF)WPIEA2006082WPIEA2006082(EXLCZ)99336000000044329220020129d2006 uf 0engur|n|---|||||txtccrAdopting Full Dollarization in Postconflict Economies : Would the Gains Compensate for the Losses in Liberia? /Liliana Schumacher, Jiro Honda1st ed.Washington, D.C. :International Monetary Fund,2006.1 online resource (25 p.)IMF Working Papers"March 2006."9781451863420 145186342X Includes bibliographical references.""Contents""; ""I. INTRODUCTION""; ""II. PROS OF DOLLARIZATION: ANALYTICAL CONSIDERATIONS AND EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE""; ""III. CONS OF DOLLARIZATION""; ""IV. CHOICES OF CURRENCY REGIMES IN POSTCONFLICT COUNTRIES""; ""V. CONCLUSIONS: IS LIBERIA A CANDIDATE FOR FULL, DE JURE DOLLARIZATION?""; ""References""This paper discusses whether adopting the U.S. dollar as the sole legal tender could help Liberia, a postconflict economy, to boost growth and strengthen fiscal discipline. In view of the performance of exchange rate regimes in many countries and Liberia's own experience with dollarization, we conclude that Liberia should not adopt full dollarization for the following reasons: (i) the alleged benefits voiced by the proponents of dollarization, in terms of enhanced fiscal discipline and faster economic growth, are not supported by the empirical evidence; (ii) dollarization would increase the Liberian economy's vulnerability to external shocks and Liberia's social fragility; (iii) banks in fully dollarized economies face additional capitalization requirements that Liberian banks cannot meet at present; and (iv) dollarization would be costly in terms of real resources because of the loss of seigniorage.IMF Working Papers; Working Paper ;No. 2006/082Dollar, AmericanMonetary policyLiberiaBankingimfBanks and BankingimfBanks and bankingimfBanksimfCurrenciesimfCurrencyimfDebt ManagementimfDebtimfDepository InstitutionsimfDollarizationimfExchange rate arrangementsimfFinance, PublicimfForeign ExchangeimfForeign exchangeimfGovernment and the Monetary SystemimfGovernment asset and liability managementimfMicro Finance InstitutionsimfMonetary economicsimfMonetary policyimfMonetary SystemsimfMoney and Monetary PolicyimfMoneyimfMortgagesimfPayment SystemsimfPublic finance & taxationimfPublic FinanceimfRegimesimfSovereign DebtimfStandardsimfLiberiaEconomic conditionsLiberiaEconomic policyLiberiaimfDollar, American.Monetary policyBankingBanks and BankingBanks and bankingBanksCurrenciesCurrencyDebt ManagementDebtDepository InstitutionsDollarizationExchange rate arrangementsFinance, PublicForeign ExchangeForeign exchangeGovernment and the Monetary SystemGovernment asset and liability managementMicro Finance InstitutionsMonetary economicsMonetary policyMonetary SystemsMoney and Monetary PolicyMoneyMortgagesPayment SystemsPublic finance & taxationPublic FinanceRegimesSovereign DebtStandardsSchumacher Liliana1816335Honda Jiro1802746International Monetary Fund.African Dept.DcWaIMFBOOK9910969919403321Adopting Full Dollarization in Postconflict Economies4372344UNINA