03792oam 2200721I 450 991097513940332120251116232800.01-136-90789-00-415-53343-01-283-59066-297866139031120-203-84274-X1-136-90790-410.4324/9780203842744 (CKB)2560000000092895(EBL)1020299(OCoLC)810082548(SSID)ssj0000711419(PQKBManifestationID)12315801(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000711419(PQKBWorkID)10682275(PQKB)10227326(MiAaPQ)EBC1020299(Au-PeEL)EBL1020299(CaPaEBR)ebr10598538(CaONFJC)MIL390311(FINmELB)ELB137922(EXLCZ)99256000000009289520180706d2011 uy 0engur|n|---|||||txtccrIdeas and economic crises in Britain from Attlee to Blair (1945-2005) /Matthias Matthijs1st ed.London ;New York :Routledge,2011.1 online resource (273 p.)Routledge explorations in economic history ;49Routledge explorations in economic history ;49Description based upon print version of record.0-203-70923-3 0-415-57944-9 Includes bibliographical references (p. 236-251) and index.Cover; Ideas and Economic Crises in Britain from Attlee to Blair (1945-2005); Copyright; Contents; Illustrations; Acknowledgments; 1 Continuity and change in British economic policy making; 2 Crisis, ideas, and path dependence:Theoretical framework and postwar Britain's changing political economy; 3 Clement Attlee's postwar"settlement" (1945-1970):Depression, war, Keynes, Beveridge,and a new consensus; 4 Relative decline and the unraveling of consensus(1959-1979):From "having it so good" to the"winter of discontent"5 Margaret Thatcher's triumph(1975-1990):Inflation, Hayek, and the overhaul of the British state6 Thatcherism's flaws and Tony Blair's consolidation (1987-2005):From the Lawson boom to New Labour's "New Britain"; 7 Conclusion:Made in Britain; Postscript:Gordon Brown, the "Great Recession," and the future of neoliberalism; Appendix:List of interviewees; Notes; Bibliography; IndexDuring the period from 1945 to 2005, Britain underwent two deep-seated institutional transformations when political elites successfully challenged the prevailing wisdom on how to govern the economy. Attlee and Thatcher were able to effectively implement most of their political platforms. During this period there were also two opportunities to challenge existing institutional arrangements. Heath's 'U-turn' in 1972 signalled his failure to implement the radical agenda promised upon election in 1970, whilst Tony Blair's New Labour similarly failed to instigate a major break with the 'ThatcheriRoutledge explorations in economic history ;49.Financial crisesGreat BritainHistoryGreat BritainEconomic policy1945-1964Great BritainEconomic policy1964-1979Great BritainEconomic policy1979-1997Great BritainEconomic policy1997-Financial crisesHistory.330.941/085Matthijs Matthias.1880509MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910975139403321Ideas and economic crises in Britain from Attlee to Blair (1945-2005)4494509UNINA02735oam 2200661I 450 991096967240332120251116232940.01-135-12856-10-203-07695-81-299-27991-01-135-12857-X10.4324/9780203076958 (CKB)2560000000099295(EBL)1143888(OCoLC)830160913(SSID)ssj0000833086(PQKBManifestationID)12410041(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000833086(PQKBWorkID)10935547(PQKB)10292929(OCoLC)841171609(MiAaPQ)EBC1143888(Au-PeEL)EBL1143888(CaPaEBR)ebr10672768(CaONFJC)MIL459241(OCoLC)839386839(OCoLC)1062921079(FINmELB)ELB134308(EXLCZ)99256000000009929520180706d2013 uy 0engur|n|---|||||txtccrThe dual system of privacy rights in the United States /Mary McThomas1st ed.New York :Routledge,2013.1 online resource (126 p.)Law, courts and politics ;1Description based upon print version of record.1-138-91474-6 0-415-65743-1 Includes bibliographical references (pages 103-116) and index.Introduction -- Legal history and theoretical development: the different foundations and formations of decisional and proprietary privacy -- Marital privacy -- Conversational privacy -- Theoretical and political implications -- Conclusion.Theoretically, the right to privacy is an individual's right to space away from the public gaze to make life choices that are best for her or him, regardless of the beliefs of the majority. Yet the right to privacy in the United States has proven problematic for both political theorists and constitutional scholars, as it does not conform to theoretical conceptions of privacy or to existing theories of constitutional development.Mary McThomas provides a new model that helps us to think about both the right to privacy as well as constitutional development. She first divides privLaw, Courts and PoliticsPrivacy, Right ofUnited StatesPrivacy, Right of323.44/80973McThomas Mary.749959MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910969672403321Dual system of privacy rights in the United States1509341UNINA