01186nlm--2200385---450-99000361319020331620120228123957.088-89529-03-2000361319USA01000361319(ALEPH)000361319USA0100036131920120119d2010----km-y0itay50------baitaITdocg#--------SnapRisorsa elettronicascuola no problemM. Beatrice Ligorio ... [et al.]RomaInfantiae.org20101 CD-ROM12 cm1 fascicolo (29 p.)Titolo dell'etichettaRequisiti non dichiaratiScuoleLavori di gruppoBNCF371.36LIGORIO,Maria BeatriceITsalbcISBD990003613190203316XVIII.UMA. 46234537 L.M.XVIII.UMA.00305642XVIII.UMA. 46a234640 L.M.XVIII.UMA.00305643ERERANNAMARIA9020120119USA011313ANNAMARIA9020120119USA011315ANNAMARIA9020120228USA011239Snap1137608UNISA03636nam 22007333u 450 991096900820332120260406194936.01-283-42741-997866134274100-19-981357-4(CKB)2550000000070090(EBL)800832(OCoLC)763157760(SSID)ssj0000634037(PQKBManifestationID)12262546(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000634037(PQKBWorkID)10621571(PQKB)11280600(MiAaPQ)EBC800832(FINmELB)ELB162265(EXLCZ)99255000000007009020140113d2011|||| u|| |engur|n|---|||||txtccrDebating the Ethics of Immigration Is There a Right to Exclude?1st ed.Oxford Oxford University Press, USA20111 online resource (349 p.)Debating EthicsDescription based upon print version of record.0-19-973172-1 Includes bibliographical references and index.Cover; Contents; Acknowledgements; Introduction; PART ONE: FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION AND THE RIGHT TO EXCLUDE; 1. In Defense of the Right to Exclude; 2. The Egalitarian Case for Open Borders; 3. The Libertarian Case for Open Borders; 4. The Democratic Case for Open Borders; 5. The Utilitarian Case for Open Borders; 6. Refugees; 7. Toward an International Institution with Authority over Immigration; 8. Guest Workers; 9. Selection Criteria; 10. Conclusion; PART TWO: OPEN BORDERS: AN ETHICAL DEFENSE; 11. The Shape of the Debate; 12. The Case Against the Right to Exclude13. Wellman on Freedom of Association14. Consequentialist Concerns; 15. Toward a Right to Mobility; 16. Conclusion; Index; A; B; C; D; E; F; G; H; I; J; K; L; M; N; O; P; R; S; T; U; V; W; X; YDo states have the right to prevent potential immigrants from crossing their borders, or should people have the freedom to migrate and settle wherever they wish? Christopher Heath Wellman and Phillip Cole develop and defend opposing answers to this timely and important question. Appealing to the right to freedom of association, Wellman contends that legitimate states have broad discretion to exclude potential immigrants, even those who desperately seek to enter. Against this, Cole argues that the commitment to the moral equality of all human beings - which legitimate states can be expected toDebating EthicsEmigration and immigration -- Moral and ethical aspectsImmigrants -- Civil rightsEmigration and immigrationMoral and ethical aspectsImmigrantsCivil rightsPolitical ScienceHILCCLaw, Politics & GovernmentHILCCImmigration & EmigrationHILCCEmigration and immigration -- Moral and ethical aspects.Immigrants -- Civil rights.Emigration and immigrationMoral and ethical aspects.ImmigrantsCivil rights.Political ScienceLaw, Politics & GovernmentImmigration & Emigration172.1172/.1Wellman Christopher Heath855012Cole Phillip1806867AU-PeELAU-PeELAU-PeELBOOK9910969008203321Debating the Ethics of Immigration4559722UNINA