03646nam 2200733 a 450 991096867530332120240516095757.0979-88-908447-4-3979-88-9313-065-21-4696-0242-30-8078-7289-X(CKB)2670000000139748(EBL)830254(OCoLC)769344367(SSID)ssj0000775626(PQKBManifestationID)11421489(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000775626(PQKBWorkID)10733671(PQKB)11688249(StDuBDS)EDZ0000245686(OCoLC)835769271(MdBmJHUP)muse23393(Au-PeEL)EBL830254(CaPaEBR)ebr10521879(MiAaPQ)EBC830254(EXLCZ)99267000000013974820120120d2011 uy 0engur|n|---|||||txtccrA way forward building a globally competitive South /Global Reasearch Institute, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill ; Daniel P. Gitterman and Peter A. Coclanis, editors1st ed.Chapel Hill, N.C. University of North Carolina Press20111 online resource (218 p.)Description based upon print version of record.0-8078-7335-7 Includes bibliographical references.The South and 20th-century economic history -- 25 years later: revisiting Halfway home and Shadows in the sunbelt 1986-2011 -- Providing a nationally competitive education for all students -- Preparing a flexible, globally competitive workforce -- Public universities in a new economic era -- Increasing the economic development role of higher education -- Increasing the South's capacity to innovate and implement new economic development strategies -- Urban, rural and green -- Work, the safety net, and faith -- A changing Southern demography -- Southern politics and policy: then, now, and tomorrow -- Visions for the future of the South.Immense changes have come about in both North Carolina and the South more broadly in the last half century. Both the state and the region as a whole experienced rapid economic growth in the second half of the twentieth century, and living standards for the vast majority of the population in the South improved dramatically. By the mid-1980s, sufficient time had elapsed so that the South's postwar economic record could be placed in a broader and more balanced historical context, a task that seemed particularly important because signs of economic distress had begun to surface in both the state anEconomic developmentNorth CarolinaDéveloppement économiqueCaroline du NordEconomic developmentfast(OCoLC)fst00901785Economic historyfast(OCoLC)fst00901974Economic policyfast(OCoLC)fst00902025Southern StatesEconomic conditions1945-Economic developmentDéveloppement économiqueEconomic development.Economic history.Economic policy.303.482330.975Gitterman Daniel1855071Coclanis Peter A.1952-1647363University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.Global Research Institute.MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910968675303321A way forward4452996UNINA03740nam 22005415 450 991105460050332120260107120357.03-032-13044-110.1007/978-3-032-13044-0(CKB)44898706400041(MiAaPQ)EBC32476332(Au-PeEL)EBL32476332(DE-He213)978-3-032-13044-0(EXLCZ)994489870640004120260107d2026 u| 0engur|||||||||||txtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierBranching Darwinisms: The Rise and Fall of the Eclipse Metaphor in the Historiography of Evolutionary Biology /by David Ceccarelli1st ed. 2026.Cham :Springer Nature Switzerland :Imprint: Springer,2026.1 online resource (316 pages)Evolutionary Biology – New Perspectives on Its Development,2524-776X ;103-032-13043-3 Chapter 1: Introduction -- Chapter 2: Constructing and debating Darwinism -- Chapter 3: From difficulties to objections, 1859-1872 -- Chapter 4: Evolutionary biology across the 19th and the 20th centuries: Pluralism and Theoretical Inhomogeneity -- Chapter 5: A struggle for consensus: evolutionary debates and public perception in the early 20th century -- Chapter 6: The Evolutionary Synthesis and the Eclipse Narrative -- Chapter 7: Rediscovering evolutionary traditions: the eclipse of Darwinism in a cross-disciplinary perspective -- Chapter 8: Conclusions: metaphors for an history of evolutionary biology.This book offers a meta-historical analysis of the “eclipse of Darwinism” narrative in evolutionary biology. It examines major historiographical labels – such as “Darwinism,” “anti-Darwinian,” “eclipse of Darwinism,” and “modern synthesis” – highlighting their varying uses in past and current historiography. This analysis not only invites a rethinking of how evolutionary biology’s development is periodized but also clarifies how historical narratives shape modern scientific practice by revealing the link between scientific practice and historical interpretation. Using a historical and epistemological perspective, the volume explores both the history of the “eclipse” period and how evolutionary biologists and historians have written that history. Its methodology integrates the study of historiographical traditions with analyses of scientific writings, popular accounts, and personal correspondence among scholars. The book concludes that the “eclipse” metaphor has lost heuristic value and that dividing biology into pre- and post-synthetic phases is misleading. Darwinism neither entered the 1880s–1920s as a unified program nor simply fragmented into isolated strands. Instead, evolutionary studies comprised diverse traditions that branched out and progressively specialized.Evolutionary Biology – New Perspectives on Its Development,2524-776X ;10Evolution (Biology)ScienceHistoryEvolutionary BiologyHistory of ScienceEvolutionary TheoryEvolution (Biology)ScienceHistory.Evolutionary Biology.History of Science.Evolutionary Theory.576.8Ceccarelli David1771318MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9911054600503321Branching Darwinisms: The Rise and Fall of the Eclipse Metaphor in the Historiography of Evolutionary Biology4534520UNINA