04367nam 22007214a 450 991096633430332120200520144314.01-280-86867-897866108686741-4294-2717-590-474-0829-21-4337-0455-210.1163/9789047408291(CKB)1000000000334780(EBL)280453(OCoLC)476023558(SSID)ssj0000096661(PQKBManifestationID)11119519(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000096661(PQKBWorkID)10082034(PQKB)10158345(MiAaPQ)EBC280453(Au-PeEL)EBL280453(CaPaEBR)ebr10171752(CaONFJC)MIL86867(OCoLC)437175208(OCoLC)191930851(nllekb)BRILL9789047408291(MiAaPQ)EBC32226766(Au-PeEL)EBL32226766(EXLCZ)99100000000033478020050628d2005 uy 0engur|n|---|||||txtccrAchieving peace or protecting human rights? conflicts between norms regarding ethnic discrimination in the Dayton Peace Agreement /by Gro Nystuen1st ed.Leiden ;Boston Martinus Nijhoff Publishers20051 online resource (310 p.)Raoul Wallenberg Institute human rights library ;v. 23Originally presented as the author's thesis (doctoral)--University of Oslo, 2004.90-04-14652-0 Includes bibliographical references (p. 255-261) and index.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS -- CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION -- CHAPTER 2. METHODOLOGY -- CHAPTER 3. THE DAYTON PEACE AGREEMENT - BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW -- CHAPTER 4. THE GENERAL FRAMEWORK AGREEMENT FOR PEACE IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA -- CHAPTER 5. PROTECTION AGAINST ETHNIC DISCRIMINATION IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA -- CHAPTER 6. ETHNIC DIFFERENTIATION RULES IN THE BH CONSTITUTION -- CHAPTER 7. THE SCOPE OF CONFLICT BETWEEN THE NON-DISCRIMINATION RULES AND THE -- RULES AUTHORISING ETHNIC DIFFERENTIATION -- CHAPTER 8. POSSIBLE JUSTIFICATIONS FOR ETHNIC DIFFERENTIATION IN EMERGENCIES -- CHAPTER 9. POSSIBLE WAYS OF ADDRESSING ETHNIC DIFFERENTIATION -- CHAPTER 10.; CONCLUDING REMARKS -- BIBLIOGRAPHY -- TABLE OF CASES -- ANNEX I -- ANNEX II -- INDEX."Achieving peace or protecting human rights? Conflicts between norms regarding ethnic discrimination in the Dayton Peace Agreement" examines some of the legal issues pertaining to international settlements aiming at ending a war, finding political common ground between bitter enemies, and at the same time, protecting individual human rights. The author examines the Dayton Peace Agreement for Bosnia and Herzegovina, and in particular the constitutional framework which on the one hand secures everyone's human rights and protection from ethnic discrimination, but on the other hand sets up a political system which in fact discriminates on the basis of ethnicity. The author argues that it might have been consistent with international law (particularly the legal regimes of derogation and necessity) to agree on such a constitutional system at the time of the Dayton negotiations because the alternative was a high risk of continued war, but that a constitutional arrangement with clear human rights deficiencies should have been made temporary. The author points out that the ethnically-based constitutional system, for the time being, seems to prevail at the expense of the right to non-discrimination, and discusses various possibilities of altering this situation.Raoul Wallenberg Institute human rights library ;v. 23.Yugoslav War, 1991-1995PeaceDiscriminationLaw and legislationFormer Yugoslav republicsHuman rightsFormer Yugoslav republicsYugoslav War, 1991-1995Peace.DiscriminationLaw and legislationHuman rights341.4/8Nystuen Gro599364MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910966334303321Achieving peace or protecting human rights1025103UNINA