00985nam0-22003371i-450 99000066774040332120200309110815.0000066774FED01000066774(Aleph)000066774FED0120020821d1964----km-y0itay50------baengUSy-------001yy<<The >>view from the roadby Donald Appleyard, Kevin Lynch and John R. MyerCambridge, MAMassachusetts Institute of Technology196464 p.ill.28 cmAppleyard,Donald32898Lynch,Kevin<1918-1984>11116Myer,John R.33835ITUNINARICAUNIMARCBK990000667740403321168 SEZ. ANDRIELLO3140DARPU01 FB 10940488DINSTE1/20535DINTRDARPUDINSTDINTRView from the road326291UNINA04524nam 22007331 450 991096489100332120021204165756.0978661080056897814725621971472562194978128080056612808005699781847311504184731150410.5040/9781472562197(CKB)1000000000338585(EBL)270667(OCoLC)476004584(SSID)ssj0000258239(PQKBManifestationID)12078702(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000258239(PQKBWorkID)10254132(PQKB)11314204(Au-PeEL)EBL1750715(CaPaEBR)ebr10276361(CaONFJC)MIL80056(OCoLC)893331536(OCoLC)181844913(UtOrBLW)bpp09256500(Au-PeEL)EBL270667(MiAaPQ)EBC1750715(MiAaPQ)EBC270667(UtOrBLW)BP9781472562197BC(EXLCZ)99100000000033858520140929d2000 uy 0engur|n|---|||||txtccrA theory of precedent from analytical positivism to a post-analytical philosophy of law /by Raimo Siltala1st ed.Oxford [England] ;Portland, Oregon :Hart Publishing,2000.1 online resource (304 p.)Description based upon print version of record.9781841131237 9781841131238 1841131237 Includes bibliographical references (pages [269]-278) and index.Part A: How to Do Things with Precedents. 1 Frame of Analysis ; 2 The Concept of a Legal Norm: Legal Rules and Principles ; 3 A Theory of Precedent Ideology ; 4 Confrontations ; 5 Theory and Practice of Precedent-Following -- Part B: A Theory of the Multi-Level Structure of Law. 6 Towards a Rule of Law Ideology for Precedents ; 7 Discourse-Theoretical Frame of Law: Ratio and Auctoritas, and the Felicity Conditions of Legal Adjudication ; 8 The Quest for the Final Premises of Law - I: The Infrastructures of Legal Norm Constitution ; 9 The Quest for the Final Premises of Law - II: The Infrastructures of Judicial Signification under Precedent-Following ; 10 Summary."Analytical jurisprudence has been mostly silent on the role of precedent in legal adjudication. What is the content of a judge's precedent ideology,or the rule of precedent-recognition, by means of which the ratio of a case is to be distinguished from mere dicta? In this study, the author identifies six types of judicial precedent-ideology, among them judicial legislation, systemic construction of the underlying reasons of law in the Dworkinian sense, and a radical re-evaluation of the merits of a prior case in later adjudication, as envisioned by the American Realists. These competing models are tested against judicial experiences in the UK, US, France, Italy, Germany and Finland. By this means Lon Fuller's famous 'internal morality of law' is shown to function rather poorly in the context of precedents, and the author therefore suggests a redefinition of the rule which makes it work for precedent. This, in turn leads the author to confront fundamental questions about the normative nature of law. Is Kelsen's grundnorm or Hart's ultimate rule of recognition a valid rule, in the image of legal rules proper, or is it merely a social fact, observable only in the practices and behaviour of judges and other officials? The author claims that Hart is caught between Kelsen and J.L. Borges, the late Argentinian fabulist, in so far as the ontology and epistemology of the rule of recognition are concerned. This leads the author to the conclusion that the two predicaments affecting analytical positivism, namely the threat of endless self-referentiality, or infinite regress, can only be accounted for by means of recourse to the philosophy of deconstruction as posited by Jacques Derrida."--Bloomsbury Publishing.LawPhilosophyStare decisisJurisprudence & philosophy of lawLawPhilosophy.Stare decisis.340/.1Siltala Raimo1799100UtOrBLWUtOrBLWBOOK9910964891003321A theory of precedent4342259UNINA04100nam 22008652 450 991095987250332120151005020621.01-107-14411-61-280-54105-90-511-21512-60-511-21691-20-511-21154-60-511-31559-70-511-48877-70-511-21331-X(CKB)1000000000353841(EBL)266533(OCoLC)171139077(SSID)ssj0000122959(PQKBManifestationID)11143335(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000122959(PQKBWorkID)10131732(PQKB)11718836(UkCbUP)CR9780511488771(MiAaPQ)EBC266533(Au-PeEL)EBL266533(CaPaEBR)ebr10131634(CaONFJC)MIL54105(OCoLC)70900817(PPN)166817791(EXLCZ)99100000000035384120090227d2004|||| uy| 0engur|||||||||||txtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierClass practices how parents help their children get good jobs /Fiona Devine1st ed.Cambridge :Cambridge University Press,2004.1 online resource (xi, 285 pages) digital, PDF file(s)Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015).0-521-00653-8 0-521-80941-X Includes bibliographical references (p. 265-275) and indexes.Material help with education and employment -- Financial choices and sacrifices for children -- Aspirations and ambitions for 'good' jobs -- Hopes, happiness and 'fulfilling potential' -- Luck and contacts in the forging of careers -- Networks and friends in school and beyond.This important new book is a comparative study of social mobility based on qualitative interviews with middle-class parents in America and Britain. It addresses the key issue in stratification research, namely, the stability of class relations and middle-class reproduction. Drawing on interviewee accounts of how parents mobilised economic, cultural and social resources to help them into professional careers, it then considers how the interviewees, as parents, seek to increase their children's chances of educational success and occupational advancement. Middle-class parents may try to secure their children's social position but it is not an easy or straightforward affair. With the decline of the quality of state education and increased job insecurity in the labour market since the 1970s and 1980s, the reproduction of advantage is more difficult than in the affluent decades of the 1950s and 1960s. The implications for public policy, especially public investment in higher education, are considered.EmployeesRecruitingSocial aspectsGreat BritainEmployeesRecruitingSocial aspectsUnited StatesSocial mobilityGreat BritainSocial mobilityUnited StatesParentsSocial networksGreat BritainParentsSocial networksUnited StatesEducationParent participationGreat BritainEducationParent participationUnited StatesSocial surveysGreat BritainSocial surveysUnited StatesEmployeesRecruitingSocial aspectsEmployeesRecruitingSocial aspectsSocial mobilitySocial mobilityParentsSocial networksParentsSocial networksEducationParent participationEducationParent participationSocial surveysSocial surveys305.5/13/09Devine Fiona141991UkCbUPUkCbUPBOOK9910959872503321Class practices4426134UNINA