04290nam 22006615 450 991096260900332120210716003644.09780823285815082328581210.1515/9780823285815(CKB)4100000009375288(MiAaPQ)EBC5906405(OCoLC)1122461849(MdBmJHUP)muse75954(DE-B1597)555271(DE-B1597)9780823285815(OCoLC)1178769247(Perlego)1245740(EXLCZ)99410000000937528820200723h20192019 fg 0engurcnu||||||||txtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierFundamentalism or Tradition Christianity after Secularism /Aristotle Papanikolaou, George E. DemacopoulosNew York, NY :Fordham University Press,[2019]©20191 online resource (vi, 275 pages)Orthodox Christianity and Contemporary ThoughtFront matter --Contents --Introduction: Being as Tradition --Secularism: The Golden Lie --Collectivistic Christianities and Pluralism: An Inquiry into Agency and Responsibility --What Difference Do Women Make? Retelling the Story of Catholic Responses to Secularism --The Secular Pilgrimage of Orthodoxy in America --Saeculum– Ecclesia– Caliphate: An Eternal Golden Braid --A Secularism of the Royal Doors: Toward an Eastern Orthodox Christian Theology of Secularism --Fundamentalism: Not Just a Cautionary Tale --Resolving the Tension between Tradition and Restorationism in American Orthodoxy --Fundamentalists, Rigorists, and Traditionalists: An Unorthodox Trinity --“Orthodoxy or Death”: Religious Fundamentalism during the Twentieth and Twenty- first Centuries --Confession and the Sacrament of Penance after Communism --Conscience and Catholic Identity --Fundamentalism as a Preconscious Response to a Perceived Threat --Acknowledgments --Contributors --IndexTraditional, secular, and fundamentalist—all three categories are contested, yet in their contestation they shape our sensibilities and are mutually implicated, the one with the others. This interplay brings to the foreground more than ever the question of what it means to think and live as Tradition. The Orthodox theologians of the twentieth century, in particular, have emphasized Tradition not as a dead letter but as a living presence of the Holy Spirit. But how can we discern Tradition as living discernment from fundamentalism? What does it mean to live in Tradition when surrounded by something like the “secular”? These essays interrogate these mutual implications, beginning from the understanding that whatever secular or fundamentalist may mean, they are not Tradition, which is historical, particularistic, in motion, ambiguous and pluralistic, but simultaneously not relativistic. Contributors: R. Scott Appleby, Nikolaos Asproulis, Brandon Gallaher, Paul J. Griffiths, Vigen Guroian, Dellas Oliver Herbel, Edith M. Humphrey, Slavica Jakelić, Nadieszda Kizenko, Wendy Mayer, Brenna Moore, Graham Ward, Darlene Fozard WeaverSecularismReligious fundamentalismSecularism.Religious fundamentalism.230.19Appleby R. Scott502011Asproulis Nikolaos919344Fozard Weaver Darlene1807226Gallaher Brandon1807227Griffiths Paul J994255Guroian Vigen1807228Herbel Dellas Oliver1807229Humphrey Edith M1471925Jakelić Slavica923938Kizenko Nadieszda1807230Mayer Wendy1092430Moore Brenna1807231Ward Graham116297Demacopoulos George E.edthttp://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edtPapanikolaou Aristotleedthttp://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edtDE-B1597DE-B1597BOOK9910962609003321Fundamentalism or Tradition4356833UNINA