05585oam 22011174 450 991096191720332120250426110115.0978661284143997814623366231462336620978145277632314527763269781451870503145187050797812828414371282841432(CKB)3170000000055084(EBL)1607968(SSID)ssj0000943972(PQKBManifestationID)11559066(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000943972(PQKBWorkID)10978555(PQKB)10170345(OCoLC)467921269(IMF)WPIEE2008192(MiAaPQ)EBC1607968(IMF)WPIEA2008192WPIEA2008192(EXLCZ)99317000000005508420020129d2008 uf 0engurcnu||||||||txtccrAre Emerging Asia’s Reserves Really Too High? /Marta Ruiz-Arranz, Milan Zavadjil1st ed.Washington, D.C. :International Monetary Fund,2008.1 online resource (36 p.)IMF Working PapersIMF working paper ;WP/08/192Description based upon print version of record.9781451915037 1451915039 Contents; I. Introduction; II. Developments in Reserve Adequacy Indicators; Tables; 1. Volatilities of Capital Flows in Asia-Pacific Economies; Box 1: Why Scale Reserves by Gross External Liabilities?; III. An Insurance Model of Optimal Reserves; 2. Output Loss in Asian Crisis; 3. Interest Rate Spreads; 4. Estimated Sterilization Financing Costs; 5. Foreign Reserves Levels: Optimal Vs. Actual; IV. A Threshold Model of Spreads-Reserves Elasticity; 6. Thresholds in the Spreads-Reserves Relations; V. Conclusions7. Threshold Estimates of the Elasticity of EMBI Spreads with Respect to International Reserves Traditional Indicators 8. Threshold Estimates of the Elasticity of EMBI Spreads with Respect to International Reserves New Indicators; Figures; 1. Reserves in U.S. dollar, 1990-2007; 2. Reserves in percent of GDP, 1990-2007; 3. Reserves in months of exports of goods and services, 1990-2007; 4. Reserves in percent of short-term debt, 1990-2007; 5. Reserves in percent of gross external liabilities, 1990-2007; 6. Asia Emerging Markets: External Liabilities, 1990-20067. Reserves in percent of broad money, 1990-2007 8. Reserves to Financial System Deposits, Equities, and Bonds, 1990-2005; 9. The Optimal Level of International Reserves, 2007; 10. Optimal vs. Actual Levels of International Reserves in Asia; 11. The Optimal Level of International Reserves and Traditional Reserve Adequacy Indicators; 12. International Reserves and Threshold Estimates; Appendix; A.1. Variable Definitions and Sources; A.2. Summary Statistics; ReferencesEmpirical analysis does not suggest that reserves are "too high" in the majority of Asian countries, though China may be a special case. Much of the reserve increase in Asia can be explained by an optimal insurance model under which reserves provide a steady source of liquidity to cushion the impact of a sudden stop in capital inflows on output and consumption. Moreover, the benefits of reserves in terms of reduced spreads on privately held external debt further explains the observed growth in reserves since 1997-98. Using threshold estimation techniques, the paper shows that most of Asia can still benefit from higher reserves in terms of reduced borrowing costs.IMF Working Papers; Working Paper ;No. 2008/192Foreign exchange administrationAsiaForeign exchangeAsiaCapital movementsAsiaBankingimfBanks and BankingimfCapital flowsimfCapital movementsimfDebts, ExternalimfExports and ImportsimfExternal debtimfForeign exchange reservesimfInternational economicsimfInternational InvestmentimfInternational Lending and Debt ProblemsimfInternational reservesimfLong-term Capital MovementsimfMonetary PolicyimfReserves accumulationimfSudden stopsimfTaiwan Province of ChinaimfForeign exchange administrationForeign exchangeCapital movementsBankingBanks and BankingCapital flowsCapital movementsDebts, ExternalExports and ImportsExternal debtForeign exchange reservesInternational economicsInternational InvestmentInternational Lending and Debt ProblemsInternational reservesLong-term Capital MovementsMonetary PolicyReserves accumulationSudden stops332.456095Ruiz-Arranz Marta1816011Zavadjil Milan1814433DcWaIMFBOOK9910961917203321Are Emerging Asia’s Reserves Really Too High4371653UNINA