02926nam 2200685Ia 450 991096155780332120251117072447.01-135-22975-91-135-22976-71-282-44417-497866124441730-203-09263-510.4324/9780203092637 (CKB)1000000000811376(EBL)455480(OCoLC)609844540(Au-PeEL)EBL455480(CaPaEBR)ebr10358650(CaONFJC)MIL244417(OCoLC)742296894(OCoLC)893194508(OCoLC)1059568957(FINmELB)ELB149184(MiAaPQ)EBC455480(EXLCZ)99100000000081137620780525e20101976 uy 1engur|n|---|||||txtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierBad newsVolume 1 /Glasgow University Media Group ; [written by Peter Beharrell ... et al.] ; foreword by Richard Hoggart1st ed.Abingdon ;New York Routledge2010,c19761 online resource (331 p.)Routledge revivalsOriginally published in 1976.0-415-56787-4 0-415-56376-3 Includes bibliographical references and index.BOOK COVER; TITLE_01; COPYRIGHT_01; COPYRIGHT_02; TITLE_02; COPYRIGHT_03; CONTENTS; FOREWORD; ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS; 1 REVIEWING THE NEWS; 2 CONSTRUCTING THE PROJECT; 3 INSIDE THE TELEVISION NEWSROOM; 4 MEASURE FOR EASURE; 5 CONTOURS OF COVERAGE; 6 TRADES UINIONS AND THE MEDIA; 7 DOWN TO CASES; APPENDIX 1; APPENDIX 2; NOTES; INDEXIt is a commonly held belief that television news in Britain, on whatever channel, is more objective, more trustworthy, more neutral than press reporting. The illusion is exploded in this controversial study by the Glasgow University Media Group, originally published in 1976.The authors undertook an exhaustive monitoring of all television broadcasts over 6 months, from January to June 1975, with particular focus upon industrial news broadcasts, the TUC, strikes and industrial action, business and economic affairs.Their analysis showed how television news favours certain indiviRoutledge revivals.Television broadcasting of newsGreat BritainBroadcast journalismGreat BritainJournalismObjectivityTelevision broadcasting of newsBroadcast journalismJournalismObjectivity.070.19384.554Beharrell Peter1874182Hoggart Richard126775MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910961557803321Bad news4484582UNINA