04397oam 22010214a 450 991096039690332120240408181236.09781575065502157506550910.1515/9781575065502(CKB)2550000000040510(SSID)ssj0000647259(PQKBManifestationID)12248317(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000647259(PQKBWorkID)10593419(PQKB)10948533(Au-PeEL)EBL3155574(CaPaEBR)ebr10483422(OCoLC)922991643(OCoLC)747412070(MdBmJHUP)musev2_80912(MiAaPQ)EBC3155574(DE-B1597)584512(OCoLC)1266228673(DE-B1597)9781575065502(Perlego)2195125(EXLCZ)99255000000004051020040426d2004 uy 0engurcn|||||||||txtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierThe Priest and the Great KingTemple-Palace Relations in the Persian Empire /Lisbeth S. FriedWinona Lake, Indiana :Eisenbrauns,2004.©2004.1 online resource (xv, 266 pages) mapBiblical and Judaic studies from the University of California, San Diego ;v. 10.Revision of the author's thesis (doctoral)--New York University.9781575060903 1575060906 Includes bibliographical references (p. 237-258) and indexes.Introduction -- Temple-palace relations in Babylonia -- Temple-palace relations in Egypt -- Temple-palace relations in Asia Minor -- Temple-palace relations in Yehud -- Conclusion -- Appendix.The wars that periodically engulfed the Levant in the fourth century temporarily pulled the ruling governors and satraps away from Judah, and during these times, the Judaean priesthood may have capitalized on the brief absence of Persian officials to mint coins, but they achieved their longed-for independence only much later, under the Maccabees."--Jacket."Lisbeth S. Fried's study investigates the impact of Achaemenid rule on the political power of local priesthoods during the 6th-4th centuries B.C.E. Scholars typically assume that, as long as tribute was sent to Susa, the capital of the Achaemenid Empire, subject peoples remained autonomous. Fried's work challenges this assumption. She examines the inscriptions, coins, temple archives, and literary texts from Babylon, Egypt, Asia Minor, and Judah and concludes that there was no local autonomy. The only people with power in the Empire were Persians and their appointees. This was true for Judah as well. The High Priest had no real power; there was no theocracy.Biblical and Judaic studies ;v. 10.KönigswdStaat (politicologie)gttTempelsgttReligiongndStaatsformgndSatrapiegndPriestergndPolitikgndTemplesfast(OCoLC)fst01147397Religion and politicsfast(OCoLC)fst01093842Politics and governmentfast(OCoLC)fst01919741Religion and politicsMiddle EastHistoryTo 1500TemplesMiddle EastHistoryTo 1500IranPolitics and governmentTo 640nliIranAltertumgndMiddle EastfastIranfastIranHistoryTo 640IranPolitics and governmentHochschulschrift.History.König.Staat (politicologie)Tempels.Religion.Staatsform.Satrapie.Priester.Politik.Temples.Religion and politics.Politics and government.Religion and politicsHistoryTemplesHistory322/.1/0935Fried Lisbeth S710621MdBmJHUPMdBmJHUPBOOK9910960396903321The Priest and the Great King4360816UNINA