01508cac--2200457---450-99000102256020331620130410083613.00102256USA010102256(ALEPH)000102256USA01010225620020308d1981----km-y0itay50------baitaITy|||z|||001yy<<Un>> nuovo manoscritto dei Cynegetica pseudo-oppianei[Antonio Zumbo][S.l.s.n.]1981[95]-103 p.24 cmTitolo dell'intitolazioneNome dell'autore a p. 103Estratto da: Bollettino dei classici, serie 3, fasc. 2 (1981)881.01ZUMBO,Antonio184796ITsalbcISBD990001022560203316XV.8. 1610227266 L.M.XV.8.BKFSOPATTY9020020308USA011041PATTY9020020308USA011115PATTY9020020325USA01162520020403USA011743PATRY9020040406USA011711ANNAMARIA9020130405USA011106ANNAMARIA9020130405USA011429ANNAMARIA9020130408USA010850ANNAMARIA9020130408USA010908ANNAMARIA9020130408USA011051ANNAMARIA9020130410USA010836Nuovo manoscritto dei Cynegetica pseudo-oppianei1517550UNISA02843nam 2200601Ia 450 991096036690332120200520144314.097815933270571593327056(CKB)2670000000341078(EBL)1128633(OCoLC)831120728(SSID)ssj0000856086(PQKBManifestationID)11440451(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000856086(PQKBWorkID)10804896(PQKB)11597078(MiAaPQ)EBC1128633(Au-PeEL)EBL1128633(CaPaEBR)ebr10677869(Perlego)2024075(EXLCZ)99267000000034107820130211d2013 uy 0engur|n|---|||||txtccrEstimating drug use the effect of sampling methods and policy implications /Janine Kremling1st ed.El Paso LFB Scholarly Publishing LLC20131 online resource (202 p.)Criminal justice: recent scholarshipDescription based upon print version of record.9781593325190 1593325193 Includes bibliographical references and index.List of tables -- List of figures -- Overview of the duf and adam program : understanding the problem -- Why is it important to study illicit drug use? -- DUF and ADAM program : criticism and transition from a the convenience to a probability sample -- Data description and analytical strategy -- Results of the equivalence analysis : assessing the impact of sampling procedures -- Discussion and conclusion -- Appendices -- References -- Index.Kremling uses data from the Drug Use Forecasting (DUF) and the Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) programs to explore whether the drug estimates of DUF, using a non-probability sample, and the drug use estimates of ADAM, using a probability sample, yield different results. She finds that the drug use information in DUF and ADAM is not substantially different for marijuana, cocaine, and opiates for all sites analyzed together. Her main conclusion is that a probability sample does not produce results that are substantially different from a convenience sample. While a researcher can attempt toCriminal Justice: Recent ScholarshipDrug abuseResearchUnited StatesSubstance abuseUnited StatesResearchDrug abuseResearchSubstance abuseResearch.362.29/120973Kremling Janine1977-1813404MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910960366903321Estimating drug use4366493UNINA