04074nam 2200733Ia 450 991095820460332120200520144314.09786612254437978902729548490272954849781282254435128225443X9781423766353142376635010.1075/scl.13(CKB)1000000000459833(SSID)ssj0000130968(PQKBManifestationID)12002850(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000130968(PQKBWorkID)10097695(PQKB)10579023(SSID)ssj0000278267(PQKBManifestationID)11225414(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000278267(PQKBWorkID)10257637(PQKB)11480606(MiAaPQ)EBC622385(DE-B1597)720632(DE-B1597)9789027295484(EXLCZ)99100000000045983320040315d2004 uy 0engurcnu||||||||txtccrCorpus approaches to grammaticalization in English /edited by Hans Lindquist, Christian Mair1st ed.Philadelphia J. Benjamins20041 online resource (279 pages)Studies in corpus linguistics,1388-0373 ;v. 13"Contains revised versions of five out of six papers presented at the international symposium ... organized by Hans Lindquist at V?axj?o University, Sweden, in 20-22 April 2001"--Pref.9781588115232 1588115232 9789027222848 9027222843 Includes bibliographical references and indexes.Corpus Approaches to Grammaticalization in English -- Editorial page -- Title page -- LCC page -- Table of contents -- Preface -- Introduction -- References -- Three perspectives on grammaticalization -- Notes -- References -- Have to, gotta, must -- Notes -- References -- The semantic path from modality to aspect -- Notes -- Appendix -- References -- The passival and the progressive passive -- Notes -- Appendix -- References -- Corpus linguistics and grammaticalisation theory -- Notes -- Appendix: Statistical documentation for Figures 1 to 5 -- References -- Grammaticalisation from side to side -- Notes -- References -- Are low-frequency complex prepositions grammaticalized? -- Notes -- References -- Life after degrammaticalisation -- Notes -- Appendix -- References -- Subject clitics in English -- Notes -- Appendix -- References -- Name index -- Subject index -- The series Studies in Corpus Linguistics.As a counterexample to unidirectionality in grammaticalization, Newmeyer (1998:270) cites the loss of second-person singular subject clitics, e.g., in hastou and wiltou, in 16th century English (Kroch et al. 1982). These forms are a common, albeit optional, feature of Middle English. Though full thou forms replace -tou/-tow clitics in Early Modern English, second-person plural enclitics, subject proclitics, and object enclitics attest to the continued viability of clisis. This paper argues that -tou/-tow is a reduced form, not a clitic, its disappearance being attributable to loss of a phonological rule, not decliticization. This change predates the replacement of thou by you, the non-expression of subjects in imperatives, and the spread of do in questions and is sudden rather than gradual.Studies in corpus linguistics ;v. 13.English languageDiscourse analysisEnglish languageGrammaticalizationEnglish languageDiscourse analysis.English languageGrammaticalization.415Lindquist Hans476904Mair Christian550267MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910958204603321Corpus approaches to grammaticalization in English4347999UNINA