02648nam 2200649Ia 450 991095692740332120251117115545.00-19-926547-X1-281-94362-297866119436220-19-151889-1(CKB)111087313298390(EBL)728869(OCoLC)309340766(SSID)ssj0000088451(PQKBManifestationID)11112863(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000088451(PQKBWorkID)10083291(PQKB)11067815(StDuBDS)EDZ0000075560(MiAaPQ)EBC728869(Au-PeEL)EBL728869(CaPaEBR)ebr10273217(CaONFJC)MIL194362(MiAaPQ)EBC7034497(OCoLC)1262034323(FINmELB)ELB163905(Au-PeEL)EBL7034497(EXLCZ)9911108731329839020010411d2001 uy 0engur|n|---|||||txtccrNatural goodness /Philippa FootOxford Clarendon ;New York Oxford University Press20011 online resource (136 p.)Description based upon print version of record.0-19-159742-2 0-19-823508-9 Includes bibliographical references (p. [117]-121) and index.Cover; Contents; Introduction; 1. A Fresh Start?; 2. Natural Norms; 3. Transition to Human Beings; 4. Practical Rationality; 5. Human Goodness; 6. Happiness and Human Good; 7. Immoralism; Postscript; Bibliography; Index; A; B; C; D; E; F; G; H; I; J; K; L; M; N; O; P; Q; R; S; T; V; WPhilippa Foot has for many years been one of the most distinctive and influential thinkers in moral philosophy. Long dissatisfied with the moral theories of her contemporaries, she has gradually evolved a theory of her own that is radically opposed not only to emotivism and prescriptivism but also to the whole subjectivist, anti-naturalist movement deriving from David Hume. Dissatisfied also with both Kantian and utilitarian ethics, she claims to have isolated a special form ofevaluation that predicates goodness and defect only to living things considered as such: she finds this form of evaluaEthicsValuesEthics.Values.170Foot Philippa553119MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910956927403321Natural goodness4464292UNINA