03652nam 2200577Ia 450 991095623470332120251125173607.01-282-33559-697866123355940-19-971803-2(CKB)1000000000816904(OCoLC)466107037(CaPaEBR)ebrary10346411(MiAaPQ)EBC3053502(FINmELB)ELB166394(BIP)46837063(BIP)26515598(EXLCZ)99100000000081690420081229d2009 uy 0engur|||---|||||txtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierMechanical witness a history of motion picture evidence in U.S. courts /Louis-Georges Schwartz1st ed.Oxford ;New York Oxford University Press20091 online resource (140 p.)0-19-531506-5 Includes bibliographical references and index.Intro -- Contents -- 1 Introduction: After 100 Years of Evidentiary Film and Video -- 2 Introducing Films into the Courts: The 1920s -- 3 The Development of Case Law Governing the Use of Motion Picture Evidence in the 1940s and 1950s -- 4 Framing Videotape -- 5 The Rodney King Case, or Moving Testimony -- Notes -- Bibliography -- Index -- A -- B -- C -- D -- E -- F -- G -- H -- I -- K -- L -- M -- O -- P -- R -- S -- T -- U -- V -- W.Mechanical Witness is the first cultural and legal history charting the changing role and theoretical implications of film and video use as courtroom evidence. Schwartz moves from the earliest employment of film in the courts of the 1920s to the notious 1991 Rodney Kind video, revealing how the courts have developed a reliance on film and video technologies and contributed to the growing influence of visual media as a dominant mode of knowledge formation. At the same time, film and video in juridical contexts has developed a distinct theoretical legacy. The particular qualities of film as evidence both resonate with and contradict existing scholarship-focusing on economic, social, or aesthetic factors-which hitherto has defined film's status and cultural contribution. In the context of a trial, the possible meanings of a film change from its meanings when shown in a movie theater or broadcast on television, yet the public (and cinema scholars) tend to assume that the two are the same. Mechanical Witness demonstrates that we must understand evidentiary film and video's institutional specificity if we are to understand the full effects of motion picture technologies on our culture. This study sets the terms for a long overdue assessment of how the entertainment industry has shaped our film viewing practices, the place of moving picture evidence in the courtroom, and the social and cultural consequences of these intertwined histories.Video tapes in court proceedingsUnited StatesMotion picturesLaw and legislationUnited StatesEvidence, DemonstrativeUnited StatesCourtsUnited StatesJudicial processUnited StatesVideo tapes in court proceedingsMotion picturesLaw and legislationEvidence, DemonstrativeCourtsJudicial process347.73/75Schwartz Louis Georges1140205MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910956234703321Mechanical witness4458446UNINA