03338oam 2200649I 450 991095477750332120251117093149.01-283-97282-40-203-07334-71-135-10306-210.4324/9780203073346 (CKB)2670000000325568(EBL)1114662(OCoLC)827208962(SSID)ssj0000821816(PQKBManifestationID)11444485(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000821816(PQKBWorkID)10881199(PQKB)10959205(OCoLC)826685141(MiAaPQ)EBC1114662(Au-PeEL)EBL1114662(CaPaEBR)ebr10650224(CaONFJC)MIL428532(FINmELB)ELB134099(EXLCZ)99267000000032556820180706d2013 uy 0engur|n|---|||||txtccrDisagreement and skepticism /edited by Diego E. Machuca1st ed.New York :Routledge,2013.1 online resource (313 p.)Routledge studies in contemporary philosophy ;46Description based upon print version of record.0-415-53283-3 Includes bibliographical references and indexes.Front Cover; Disagreement and Skepticism; Copyright Page; Contents; Acknowledgments; 1. Editor's Introduction: Diego E. Machuca; 2. Disagreeing with the Pyrrhonist?: Otávio Bueno; 3. The Role of Disagreement in Pyrrhonian and Cartesian Skepticism: Markus Lammenranta; 4. A Neo-Pyrrhonian Approach to the Epistemology of Disagreement: Diego E. Machuca; 5. Moral Disagreement: Actual Vs. Possible: Folke Tersman; 6. The Fragility of Moral Disagreement: Zed Adams; 7. How Skeptical is the Equal Weight View?: Brandon Carey and Jonathan Matheson8. Disagreement, Skepticism, and Track-record Arguments: Duncan Pritchard9. Disagreement and Defeat: Clayton Littlejohn; 10. Disagreement: The Skeptical Arguments from Peerhood and Symmetry: Nathan L. King; 11. Dealing with Disagreement from the First-Person Perspective: A Probabilist Proposal: Trent Dougherty; 12. The Problem of Historical Variability: Nathan Ballantyne; 13. Is Philosophical Knowledge Possible?: Hilary Kornblith; 14. Defending Philosophy in the Face of Systematic Disagreement: Sanford Goldberg; Contributors; Name Index; Subject IndexThe thirteen essays in this volume explore for the first time the possible skeptical implications of disagreement in different areas and from different perspectives, with an emphasis in the current debate about the epistemic significance of disagreement. They represent a new contribution to the study of the connection between disagreement and skepticism in epistemology, metaethics, ancient philosophy, and metaphilosophy.Routledge Studies in Contemporary PhilosophySkepticismReasoningSkepticism.Reasoning.149/.73Machuca Diego E1129632MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910954777503321Disagreement and skepticism4487818UNINA