04141nam 22004933 450 991088878290332120230817190343.097881212538958121253896(MiAaPQ)EBC7075166(Au-PeEL)EBL7075166(CKB)24715213400041(Exl-AI)7075166(OCoLC)1341444120(EXLCZ)992471521340004120220819d2019 uy 0engurcnu||||||||txtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierGender Inequality1st ed.Lanham :Gyan Publishing House,2019.©2019.1 online resource (384 pages)Print version: Kolay, Swapan Kumar Gender Inequality: a Multidimensional Study Lanham : Gyan Publishing House,c2019 Cover -- Halftitle Page -- Title Page -- Copyrights Page -- Dedication -- About the Author -- About the Book -- Contents -- Preface -- Acknowledgements -- List of Tables -- List of Abbreviations -- 1. Introduction -- 2. Important Constitutional and Legal Provisions for GenderSensitisation in India -- 3. Discrimination in Wage and Economic Status of Women -- 4. Gender Inequality in Education -- 5. Gender Disparity in Health Status -- 6. Methodology -- 7. Study Area -- 8. Result and Discussion -- 9. Recommendation and Conclusion -- Bibliography.Gender is the cultural definition of behaviour defined as appropriate to the sexes in a given society at a given time. "Gender is a set of cultural roles. It is a costume, a mask, a straitjacket in which men and women dance their unequal dance." Unfortunately, the term 'gender' is used both in academic discourse and in the media as interchangeable with sex. For laymen, sex and gender are synonymous, in fact, its widespread use is probably due to it sounding a bit more 'refined' than the plain word 'sex' with its 'nasty' connotations. Such use is unfortunate, because it hides and mystifies the difference between the biologically given sex and culturally created gender. Let us make our analysis a little more clearly. Whenever in technical terms we talk about sex, we mean biological composition and whenever we talk about gender we attach a cultural meaning. When only one sex had influence over the process, as is typically the case in male-dominated pastoral or horticultural societies, tight hubs of related individuals emerged. However, the average number of related individuals is predicted to be much lower when men and women have an equal influence closely matching what was seen in the populations that were studied. Thus, there is need to describe women status in tribals' communities as well as in rural urban India. The authors argue that sexual equality may have proved an evolutionary advantage for early human societies, as it would have fostered wider-ranging social networks and closer cooperation between unrelated individuals. "It gives a far more expansive social network with a wider choice of mates, so inbreeding would be less of an issue, and persons come into contact with more people and they can share innovations, which is something that humans do par excellence." The findings appear to be supported by qualitative observations from thetribals groups in the study. In the tribal's population, women are involved in household work with outside professional works by traditional and trend modern occupation while there is still a division of labour. Overall, sociologically, the status of tribals' women is better than urban and rural women of India.Gender identityGenerated by AISex discrimination against womenGenerated by AIGender identitySex discrimination against women305.42Kolay Swapan Kumar1769746Mahant Sushila D1769747MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910888782903321Gender Inequality4241794UNINA