02312oam 2200589 a 450 991082860000332120240410132454.0979-84-00-68042-70-313-00076-X10.5040/9798400680427(CKB)111056485430198(EBL)282744(OCoLC)55051771(SSID)ssj0000193793(PQKBManifestationID)11182995(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000193793(PQKBWorkID)10226531(PQKB)11067059(Au-PeEL)EBL282744(CaPaEBR)ebr10018007(OCoLC)697709247(MiAaPQ)EBC282744(OCoLC)1049793821(DLC)BP9798400680427BC(EXLCZ)9911105648543019820000315e20002024 uy 0engurcn|||||||||txtccrThe Lochner court, myth and reality substantive due process from the 1890s to the 1930s /Michael J. Phillips1st ed.Westport, Conn. :Praeger,2000.London :Bloomsbury Publishing,20241 online resource (223 p.)Description based upon print version of record.0-275-96930-4 Includes bibliographical references (p. [201]-204) and index.Contents; Preface; 1 The Conventional Wisdom; 2 An Overview of Lochner Era Substantive Due Process; 3 What Motivated the Old Court; 4 The Question of Unequal Bargaining Power; 5 The Originalist Challenge; 6 Summing Up and Looking Ahead; Table of Cases; IndexThis text systematically examines all of the US Supreme Court's substantive due process cases from 1897 to 1937 and finds that they do not support long-held beliefs about the Lochner Court. The Court struck down far fewer laws on substantive due process grounds than is generally believed.Due process of lawUnited StatesHistoryDue process of lawHistory.347.73/5Phillips Michael J323125DLCDLCDLCBOOK9910828600003321The Lochner court, myth and reality3994101UNINA