03429nam 2200565 450 991013152570332120230621140327.09782889192557 (ebook)(CKB)3710000000504589(SSID)ssj0001680179(PQKBManifestationID)16495917(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001680179(PQKBWorkID)15028199(PQKB)10296258(WaSeSS)IndRDA00057422(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/45621(EXLCZ)99371000000050458920160829d2014 uy |engur|||||||||||txtccrEarly and late selection[electronic resource] effects of load, dilution and salience /topic editors Tal Makovski, Glyn Humphreys and Bernhard HommelFrontiers Media SA2014France :Frontiers Media SA,20141 online resource (143 pages) illustrations, chartsFrontiers Research Topics,1664-8714Bibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: MonographIncludes bibliographical references.Our visual system is constantly bombarded by a variety of stimuli, of which only a small part is relevant to the task at hand. As a result, goal-directed behavior requires a high degree of selectivity at some point in the processing stream. The precise point at which selection takes place has been the focus of much debate. Early selection advocates argue that the locus of selection is at early stages of processing and that therefore, unattended stimuli are not fully processed. In contrast, late selection theorists argue that attention operates only after stimuli have been fully processed. Evidence supporting both sides has been accumulated over the years and the debate played a central role in the attention literature for decades. Perceptual load theory was put forward as an intermediate solution: the locus of selective attention depends on task requirements. When load is high, selection is early. When load is low, selection is late. This solution has been widely accepted and the early/late debate has been, for the most part, set aside. However, recently, perceptual load theory has been challenged on both theoretical and methodological grounds. It has been argued that it is not load, but rather perceptual dilution salience and other perceptual factors that determine the efficacy of attentional selection, which would call for a reevaluation of the current status of both perceptual load theory and its proposed alternatives, and more broadly, the early/late selection debate. The goal of this Research Topic is to provide an up-to-date overview of both empirical evidence and theoretical views on these key questions.PsychologyHILCCSocial SciencesHILCCsaliencedilutionAttentionperceptual loadearly selectionLate selectionPsychologySocial SciencesTal Makovskiauth1364861Hommel BernhardMakovski TalHumphreys GlynPQKBUkMaJRU9910131525703321Early and late selection3386304UNINA01985nam 2200505 450 991082836700332120170919201029.00-8117-6344-7(CKB)3710000000666339(EBL)4519240(OCoLC)949884983(SSID)ssj0001672842(PQKBManifestationID)16471302(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001672842(PQKBWorkID)14807574(PQKB)10855531(MiAaPQ)EBC4519240(EXLCZ)99371000000066633920170517h20162016 uy 0engur|n|---|||||txtccrArmored strike force the photo history of the American 70th Tank Battalion in World War II /Charles C. Roberts JrLanham, Maryland :Stackpole Books,2016.©20161 online resource (272 p.)Description based upon print version of record.0-8117-1765-8 Includes bibliographical references.Armored Strike Force ; Contents; Introduction; Chapter 1: The Beginning: Stateside; Chapter 2: Operation Torch: The Invasion of North Africa; Chapter 3: Operation Husky: The Invasion of Sicily; Chapter 4: England; Chapter 5: Operation Overlord: The Invasion of Normandy; Chapter 6: Northern France-Belgium; Chapter 7: Germany; Chapter 8: The End of the War; References; AcknowledgmentsWorld War, 1939-1945Tank warfareWorld War, 1939-1945Regimental historiesUnited StatesWorld War, 1939-1945Tank warfare.World War, 1939-1945Regimental histories940.541273Roberts Charles C(Charles Chester),J.,1944-1605174MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910828367003321Armored strike force3930277UNINA