02941oam 2200457 450 991082759470332120190911112725.01-945349-39-5(OCoLC)1022660702(MiFhGG)GVRL7ZMT(EXLCZ)99434000000020886820170914h20182018 uy 0engurun|---uuuuardacontentrdamediardacarrierNOW classrooms, grades K-2 lessons for enhancing teaching and learning through technology /Meg Ormiston [and five others]Bloomington, Indiana :Solution Tree Press,[2018]�20181 online resource (xv, 149 pages) illustrationsNOW classroomsGale eBooks1-945349-38-7 Includes bibliographical references and index.1. Learning technology operations and concepts -- 2. Embracing creativity -- 3. Communicating and collaborating -- 4. Conducting research and curating information -- 5. Thinking critically to solve problems -- 6. Being responsible digital citizens -- 7. Expanding technology and coding concepts."As educators, educational consultants, and instructional coaches, authors Meg Ormiston, Beth Hatlen, Kristy Hopkins, Kirstin McGinnis, Lissa Blake, and Nicole Ring have seen many unproductive technology rollouts take place in schools. Through this experience, they have developed a different approach to school change. In NOW Classrooms, Grades K-2: Lessons for Enhancing Teaching and Learning Through Technology--the second book in the NOW Classrooms series--they stress that real transformational and beneficial school change focuses on robust teaching and learning, not the ever-evolving devices that may enhance that change. This book presents practical, classroom-tested lessons that teachers and instructional coaches can use to prime students in grades K-2 to actively learn and solve real-world problems. Using these lessons, which are structured around the essential 4C skills (communication, collaboration, critical thinking, and creativity), teachers can purposefully connect technology to key learning outcomes, make learning fun, and prepare students to become successful lifelong learners in the 21st century" --Provided by publisher.Education, PrimaryComputer-assisted instructionEducational technologyStudy and teaching (Primary)School improvement programsEducation, PrimaryComputer-assisted instruction.Educational technologyStudy and teaching (Primary)School improvement programs.371.33Ormiston Meghan J.1614361MiFhGGMiFhGGBOOK9910827594703321NOW classrooms, grades K-24076509UNINA03177nam 2200637I 450 991059506490332120220503111352.09780472902910047290291110.3998/mpub.11989496(CKB)5710000000040437(NjHacI)995710000000040437(MiU)10.3998/mpub.11989496(MiAaPQ)EBC7099218(Au-PeEL)EBL7099218(OCoLC)1313669504(ScCtBLL)a66dc10d-fdc9-4800-9f1d-acf33d086754(ODN)ODN0009816004(EXLCZ)99571000000004043720220503h20222022 uy 0engur|||||||||||txtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierRationality of irrationality political determinants and effects of party position blurring /Kyung Joon Han1st ed.Ann Arbor, Michigan :University of Michigan Press,2022.©20221 online resource (232 pages)Title from eBook information screen..9780472075539 0472075535 Includes bibliographical references (pages 193-215) and index.Citizens in democracies complain that political parties' positions on major issues are too ambiguous for them to confidently understand. Why is party position ambiguity so common? Are party positions ambiguous because political parties fail in forming a clear policy position or because they deliberately blur their position? Rationality of Irrationality argues that political parties are motivated to strategically blur their position on an issue when they struggle with a certain disadvantage in the issue. Specifically, political parties present an ambiguous position when their own supporters are divided in their stances on the issue. A political party also blurs a position stance when voters do not acknowledge that the party has ability and integrity to solve problems related to the issue. Political parties blur their position in these cases because ambiguous party positions divert voters' attention from the issue. Voters support a political party whose policy positions on major issues are close to their own stances. However, voters cannot confidently and exactly estimate party positions on an issue when they are only ambiguous.Political partiesPlatformsPolitical party rulesPolitical psychologyRight and left (Political science)Political partiesEurope, WesternPolitical partiesUnited StatesPolitical partiesPolitical party rules.Political psychology.Right and left (Political science)Political partiesPolitical parties324.2POL000000POL015000POL058000bisacshHan Kyung Joon1271819EYMEYMBOOK9910595064903321Rationality of Irrationality2996009UNINA