03347nam 22006974a 450 991082595700332120200520144314.01-107-13484-61-280-43435-X1-139-14849-40-511-18042-X0-511-06115-30-511-05482-30-511-48789-40-511-33098-70-511-06961-8(CKB)1000000000018119(EBL)218078(OCoLC)475924567(SSID)ssj0000105088(PQKBManifestationID)11130478(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000105088(PQKBWorkID)10086466(PQKB)10280860(UkCbUP)CR9780511487897(MiAaPQ)EBC218078(Au-PeEL)EBL218078(CaPaEBR)ebr10069861(CaONFJC)MIL43435(EXLCZ)99100000000001811920020312d2002 uy 0engur|||||||||||txtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierAn Aramaic approach to Q sources for the Gospels of Matthew and Luke /Maurice Casey1st ed.Cambridge, U.K. ;New York Cambridge University Press20021 online resource (x, 210 pages) digital, PDF file(s)Society for New Testament Studies monograph series ;122Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015).0-521-01897-8 0-521-81723-4 Includes bibliographical references (p. 191-205) and indexes.1. The state of play -- 2. Method -- 3. Scribes and pharisees: Matthew 23.23-36; Luke 11.39-51 -- 4. John the Baptist: Matthew 11.2-19; Luke 7.18-35 -- 5. Exorcism and overlapping sources. Mark 3.20-30; Matthew 12.22-32; Luke 11.14-23; 12.10 -- 6. Conclusions.This is the first book to examine the Aramaic dimension of Q since the Aramaic Dead Sea scrolls made such work more feasible. Maurice Casey gives a detailed examination of key passages in Matthew and Luke's gospels, demonstrating that they used two different Greek translations of an Aramaic source, which can be reconstructed. He overturns the conventional model of Q as a single Greek document, and shows that Jesus said everything in the original Aramaic source. Further analysis of other gospel passages shows the evangelists editing a Greek translation of an Aramaic source. On one, it can be shown that Mark utilises a different Aramaic source. A complex model of Q is thus proposed. Casey argues that Aramaic sources behind part of Q are of extremely early date, and should contribute significantly to the quest for the historical Jesus.Monograph series (Society for New Testament Studies) ;122.Q hypothesis (Synoptics criticism)Aramaic literatureRelation to the New TestamentQ hypothesis (Synoptics criticism)Aramaic literatureRelation to the New Testament.226/.066Casey Maurice1646694MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910825957003321An Aramaic approach to Q4042717UNINA