02788nam 22005895 450 991082590760332120230823004327.00-8047-7473-010.1515/9780804774734(CKB)2670000000029595(EBL)547318(OCoLC)646788482(SSID)ssj0000415833(PQKBManifestationID)12190765(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000415833(PQKBWorkID)10420841(PQKB)11368962(DE-B1597)563994(DE-B1597)9780804774734(MiAaPQ)EBC547318(OCoLC)1178769281(EXLCZ)99267000000002959520200723h20202010 fg engur|nu---uu|uutxtccrDialectic and Dialogue /Dmitri NikulinStanford, CA :Stanford University Press,[2020]©20101 online resource (184 p.)Description based upon print version of record.0-8047-7015-8 Front matter --Contents --Acknowledgments --Preface --1. In the Beginning: Dialogue and Dialectic in Plato --2. Dialectic: Via Antiqua --3. Dialectic: Via Moderna --4. Dialogue: A Systematic Outlook --5. Dialogue: Interruption --6. Against Writing --(Dialectical) Conclusion --NotesThis book considers the emergence of dialectic out of the spirit of dialogue and traces the relation between the two. It moves from Plato, for whom dialectic is necessary to destroy incorrect theses and attain thinkable being, to Cusanus, to modern philosophers—Descartes, Kant, Hegel, Schleiermacher and Gadamer, for whom dialectic becomes the driving force behind the constitution of a rational philosophical system. Conceived as a logical enterprise, dialectic strives to liberate itself from dialogue, which it views as merely accidental and even disruptive of thought, in order to become a systematic or scientific method. The Cartesian autonomous and universal yet utterly monological and lonely subject requires dialectic alone to reason correctly, yet dialogue, despite its unfinalizable and interruptive nature, is what constitutes the human condition.DialecticDialoguePhilosophy, AncientPhilosophy, ModernDialecticDialoguePhilosophy, AncientPhilosophy, Modern101Nikulin Dmitriauthttp://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut1671287DE-B1597DE-B1597BOOK9910825907603321Dialectic and Dialogue4033743UNINA