05367nam 2201333 450 991082559540332120230803195432.01-4008-5047-910.1515/9781400850471(CKB)2670000000543850(EBL)1584943(OCoLC)874965990(SSID)ssj0001180246(PQKBManifestationID)11786964(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001180246(PQKBWorkID)11198924(PQKB)10909693(MiAaPQ)EBC1584943(StDuBDS)EDZ0001059570(OCoLC)877868292(MdBmJHUP)muse43271(DE-B1597)453996(OCoLC)979686259(DE-B1597)9781400850471(Au-PeEL)EBL1584943(CaPaEBR)ebr10853227(CaONFJC)MIL585099(EXLCZ)99267000000054385020140407h20142014 uy 0engurun#---|u||utxtccrTradition and the formation of the Talmud /Moulie VidasCore TextbookPrinceton, New Jersey ;Oxfordshire, England :Princeton University Press,2014.©20141 online resource (251 p.)Based on a thesis (Ph. D) Princeton University, 2009.0-691-17086-X 0-691-15486-4 Includes bibliographical references and indexes.Front matter --Contents --A Note on Style Conventions --Introduction --Part I --Chapter One. The Alterity of Tradition --Chapter Two. The Division into Layers --Chapter Three. Composition as Critique --Part II --Chapter Four. Scholars, Transmitters, and the Making of Talmud --Chapter Five. The Debate about Recitation --Chapter Six. Tradition and Vision --Conclusion --Acknowledgments --Bibliography --Source Index --Subject IndexTradition and the Formation of the Talmud offers a new perspective on perhaps the most important religious text of the Jewish tradition. It is widely recognized that the creators of the Talmud innovatively interpreted and changed the older traditions on which they drew. Nevertheless, it has been assumed that the ancient rabbis were committed to maintaining continuity with the past. Moulie Vidas argues on the contrary that structural features of the Talmud were designed to produce a discontinuity with tradition, and that this discontinuity was part and parcel of the rabbis' self-conception. Both this self-conception and these structural features were part of a debate within and beyond the Jewish community about the transmission of tradition. Focusing on the Babylonian Talmud, produced in the rabbinic academies of late ancient Mesopotamia, Vidas analyzes key passages to show how the Talmud's creators contrasted their own voice with that of their predecessors. He also examines Zoroastrian, Christian, and mystical Jewish sources to reconstruct the debates and wide-ranging conversations that shaped the Talmud's literary and intellectual character.TalmudHistoryJewish lawInterpretation and constructionAmoraic tradition.Babylonian Talmud.Bava Qamma.Christian literature.Christian sources.Christianity.Christians.Hekhalot literature.Hekhalot tradition.Israel.Jewish culture.Jewish genealogy.Jewish history.Jewish people.Jewish tradition.Jews.Judaism.Mesopotamia.Oral Torah.Palestinian Talmud.Rav Yehuda.Sar ha-Torah narrative.Scripture.Torah study.Written Torah.Zoroastrian literature.Zoroastrian ritual.Zoroastrian sources.anonymous layer.apodictic rulings.attributed rulings.authority.composition.dialectic.discontinuity.genealogical knowledge.genealogical tradition.intellectual history.layered structure.literary design.liturgy.mystical Jewish sources.oral tradition.rabbinic culture.rabbis.recitation.religious text.sacred texts.scholarship.self-definition.self-presentation.stam.sugya.sugyot.tanna'im.tradition.TalmudHistory.Jewish lawInterpretation and construction.296.1/25066Vidas Moulie1983-1687306MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910825595403321Tradition and the formation of the Talmud4060681UNINA