04996nam 2200649 450 991082542100332120230807221004.090-272-6828-2(CKB)3710000000441651(EBL)2083576(SSID)ssj0001517740(PQKBManifestationID)12565172(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001517740(PQKBWorkID)11504984(PQKB)10361738(PQKBManifestationID)16037705(PQKB)20339655(MiAaPQ)EBC2083576(DLC) 2015017629(EXLCZ)99371000000044165120150715h20152015 uy 0engur|n|---|||||txtccrProto-Indo-European syntax and its development /edited by Leonid Kulikov, Nikolaos LavidasAmsterdam, Netherlands ;Philadelphia, Pennsylvania :John Benjamins Publishing Company,2015.©20151 online resource (164 p.)Benjamins Current Topics,1874-0081 ;Volume 75Description based upon print version of record.90-272-4263-1 Includes bibliographical references at the end of each chapters and index.Proto-Indo-European Syntax and its Development; Editorial page; Title page; LCC data; Table of contents; Preface; References; Reconstructing Proto-Indo-European categories; 1. Introduction; 2. Reflexivity and the Middle in IE languages; 3. Focusing on Hittite -z; 3.1 Functions of the middle/reflexive -z; 3.2 The data; 3.2.1 First group: Transitive reflexive; 3.2.2 Second group: Subjective reflexive; 3.2.3 Third group: Objective reflexive; 4. Functional extension of reflexive constructions in IE languages; 5. Reconstructing the PIE category 'Middle'; 6. Conclusions; ReferencesThe rise of 'subordination features' in the history of Greek and their decline1. Introduction; 2. The problem; 3. The distinction root vs. non-root clauses; 4. Pre-Classical Greek; 4.1 Stage a and subordinating conjunctions (T1): Genesis of complementizers; 4.2 Stage a: Tense shift (T4) instead of mood shift (T3); 5. Classical Greek: Stage b and the system of subordination traits; 5.1 Stage b: Subordinating conjunctions (T1) pertaining to the complementizer hóti; 5.2 Stage b: Infinitival complement clauses (T0); 5.3 Stage b: Mood shift (T3)3.1 General typological issues3.1.1 Lehmann vs. Friedrich; 3.1.2 Subordination and the finiteness constraint; 3.2 Finite relativization and SOV; 3.3 Some special features of early relative-correlatives; 3.4 Apparent difficulties; 3.4.1 "Replacive" relative clauses; 3.4.2 Old Hittite "embedded" relatives; 3.5 Conclusions regarding relativization; 4. Prosodically motivated changes confirming the verb-final reconstruction; 4.1 Suprasegmental effects of verb finality; 4.2 Segmental effects of verb finality; 4.3 Verb-finality effects as evidence that the SOV reconstruction is a fruitful hypothesis5. Summary and conclusionsAbbreviations; References; Hittite pai- 'come' and uwa- 'go' as Restructuring Verbs; 1. Introduction; 2. The Hittite phraseological construction; 3. Restructuring and Clitic Climbing; 4. The phraseological construction as an instance of Restructuring; 4.1 Restructuring and finite clauses; 4.2 The position of the matrix verb; 4.3 uwa- as a raising verb; 5. Conclusion; References; Reconstructing passive and voice in Proto-Indo-European; 1. Introduction; 2. Background; 2.1 Passive and Passivization; 2.2 The passive in ancient Indo-European languages3. Lack of specialized passive morphology in IE: Evidence from GreekThe Parametric Comparison Method (PCM, Guardiano & Longobardi 2005, Longobardi & Guardiano 2009) is grounded on the assumption that syntactic parameters are more appropriate than other traits for use as comparanda for historical reconstruction, because they are able to provide unambiguous correspondences and objective measurements, thus guaranteeing wide-range applicability and quantitative exactness. This article discusses a set of experiments explicitly designed to evaluate the impact of parametric syntax in representing historical relatedness, and performed on a selection of 26 contemporaryBenjamins current topics ;Volume 75.Proto-Indo-European languageSyntaxGrammar, Comparative and generalSyntaxLanguage acquisitionProto-Indo-European languageSyntax.Grammar, Comparative and generalSyntax.Language acquisition.415Kulikov L. I.Lavidas NikolaosMiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910825421003321Proto-Indo-European syntax and its development3920184UNINA