04075nam 2200757 a 450 991082481700332120240516182451.01-280-77276-X978661368353390-04-22995-7(CKB)2670000000193816(EBL)944159(OCoLC)796383681(SSID)ssj0000678183(PQKBManifestationID)11404875(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000678183(PQKBWorkID)10699829(PQKB)11250979(MiAaPQ)EBC944159(nllekb)BRILL9789004229952(Au-PeEL)EBL944159(CaPaEBR)ebr10571030(CaONFJC)MIL368353(PPN)174548486(PPN)170757056(EXLCZ)99267000000019381620120329d2012 uy 0engurcn|||||||||txtccrLiberal bourgeois Protestantism[electronic resource] the metaphysics of globalization /by Paul C. Mocombe1st ed.Leiden ;Boston Brill20121 online resource (191 p.)Studies in critical social sciences,1573-4234 ;v. 41Description based upon print version of record.90-04-21676-6 Includes bibliographical references and index.pt. 1. Globalization, bourgeois Protestantism and Africans in America -- pt. 2. Hybrid identities in globalization.Sociological theory regarding the contemporary (1970's to the present) phenomenon of globalization focuses either on convergence or hybridization. The former, convergence, highlights the ever-increasing homogenization of cultures and societies around the globe via socioeconomic rational forces. From this perspective globalization is tantamount to Westernization or Americanization of other cultures and societies via neoliberal economic, market, subjugation. The latter, hybridization, emphasizes heterogeneity, the mixture of cultural forms out of the integration of society via globalizing processes stemming from improvements in information technology, communications, mass media, et cetera In this latter form, cultures and societies are not homogenized, but are cultural forms that are syncretized with liberal democratic Western capitalist rational organization. In this work, Mocombe synthesizes the two positions by suggesting that globalization under American hegemony are the same process, convergence, and that the only alternative to this thesis of convergence is Samuel P. Huntington’s (1996) differential hypothesis in which a clash of civilization are the result of eight intransigent cultural frameworks—Sinic, Japan, Hindu, Islamic, Orthodox, Western Europe, North America, and Africa—that dominate the globe. Refutating Huntington’s thesis, Mocombe suggests there are really only two opposing counter-hegemonic forces to the convergence towards Westernization or Americanization: the earth itself and Islamic Fundamentalist movements.Studies in critical social sciences ;v. 41.GlobalizationSocial aspectsPhilosophyCultural fusionUnited StatesCapitalismSocial aspectsAmericanizationAfrican AmericansCultural assimilationProtestant work ethicUnited StatesHegemonySocial aspectsUnited StatesGlobalizationSocial aspectsPhilosophy.Cultural fusionCapitalismSocial aspects.Americanization.African AmericansCultural assimilation.Protestant work ethicHegemonySocial aspects303.48/2Mocombe Paul C879939MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910824817003321Liberal bourgeois Protestantism4110336UNINA