03966nam 2200613Ia 450 991082475410332120200520144314.01-283-07834-197866130783460-226-29795-010.7208/9780226297958(CKB)2560000000071756(EBL)680711(OCoLC)713010297(StDuBDS)EDZ0000119119(MiAaPQ)EBC680711(DE-B1597)523604(OCoLC)713025887(DE-B1597)9780226297958(Au-PeEL)EBL680711(CaPaEBR)ebr10464689(CaONFJC)MIL307834(EXLCZ)99256000000007175620100413d2011 uy 0engur|n|---|||||txtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierPolitical epistemics the secret police, the opposition, and the end of East German socialism /Andreas GlaeserChicago University of Chicago Pressc20111 online resource (642 p.)Chicago studies in practices of meaningDescription based upon print version of record.0-226-29793-4 0-226-29794-2 Includes bibliographical references and index.Frontmatter -- Contents -- Illustrations -- Abbreviations -- Preface -- Acknowledgments -- Introduction: Understandings, Politics, and Institutions -- Introduction -- 1. From Marx to Conscious Social Transformation -- 2. Aporias of Producing Right Consciousness -- 3. Constituting Understandings through Validations -- 4. Dialectics in Spaces of Validation -- Introduction -- 5. Guardians of the Party State -- 6. Stasi Culture-Authority, Networks, and Discourses -- 7. When Someone's Eden Becomes Another's Purgatory -- 8. Forming Groups, Organizing Opposition -- 9. Attempting to Know and Control the Opposition -- Conclusions: Paralyzing Uncertainties -- References -- IndexWhat does the durability of political institutions have to do with how actors form knowledge about them? Andreas Glaeser investigates this question in the context of a fascinating historical case: socialist East Germany's unexpected self-dissolution in 1989. His analysis builds on extensive in-depth interviews with former secret police officers and the dissidents they tried to control as well as research into the documents both groups produced. In particular, Glaeser analyzes how these two opposing factions' understanding of the socialist project came to change in response to countless everyday experiences. These investigations culminate in answers to two questions: why did the officers not defend socialism by force? And how was the formation of dissident understandings possible in a state that monopolized mass communication and group formation? He also explores why the Stasi, although always well informed about dissident activities, never developed a realistic understanding of the phenomenon of dissidence. Out of this ambitious study, Glaeser extracts two distinct lines of thought. On the one hand he offers an epistemic account of socialism's failure that differs markedly from existing explanations. On the other hand he develops a theory-a sociology of understanding-that shows us how knowledge can appear validated while it is at the same time completely misleading.Chicago studies in practices of meaning.SocialismGermany (East)SocialismEurope, EasternGermany (East)Politics and governmentSocialismSocialism320.53/150943109048Glaeser Andreas1718045MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910824754103321Political epistemics4114727UNINA