02109nas 2200649-a 450 991030795210332120231125213021.02199-7411(DE-599)ZDB2842796-8(OCoLC)565133973(CKB)110978976776991(CONSER)--2019217317(EXLCZ)9911097897677699120100321a19609999 --- aengurbn||||||abpurbn||||||adatxtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierThe Indian journal of international law official organ of the Indian Society of International LawBombay Jaico Pub. House1960-1 online resource illustrationsIssues for 1960-<1970> include a section of official documents.Imprint varies, <1971-2001>: New Delhi : Indian Society of International Law.0019-5294 INDIAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAWIJILIndian j. int. lawInternational lawPeriodicalsInternational lawIndiaPeriodicalsDroit internationalPériodiques86.80 international law: general(NL-LeOCL)077608410bclInternational lawfastInternationaal rechtgttVolkenrechtgttIndiafastPeriodicalperiodicals.aatPeriodicalsfastPeriodicals.lcgftPériodiques.rvmgfLaw (General)Recht (algemeen)International lawInternational lawDroit international86.80 international law: general.International lawInternationaal recht.Volkenrecht.341Indian Society of International Law.JOURNAL9910307952103321Indian journal of international law793284UNINA05271nam 2200661Ia 450 991078212320332120200520144314.01-281-86948-197866118694891-86094-975-4(CKB)1000000000537748(EBL)1681540(OCoLC)815742429(SSID)ssj0000130993(PQKBManifestationID)11129153(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000130993(PQKBWorkID)10099460(PQKB)10499215(MiAaPQ)EBC1681540(WSP)0000P226(Au-PeEL)EBL1681540(CaPaEBR)ebr10255841(CaONFJC)MIL186948(PPN)168209063(EXLCZ)99100000000053774820010125d2001 uy 0engur|n|---|||||txtccrCorrelation and dependence[electronic resource] /Dominique Drouet Mari, Samuel KotzLondon Imperial College Press ;River Edge, NJ Distributed by World Scientific Pub. Co.c20011 online resource (236 p.)Description based upon print version of record.1-86094-264-4 Includes bibliographical references (p. 203-215) and index.Contents ; Preface ; Chapter 1 Notations and Definitions ; 1.1 Notations ; 1.2 Definitions ; Chapter 2 Correlation and Dependence : An Introspection ; 2.1 Independence ; 2.2 Zero Correlation Versus Dependence ; 2.3 Some Geometrical Examples ; 2.4 Some Further Historical Remarks2.5 A Brief Tour of Early Applications and Misinterpretations Chapter 3 Concepts of Dependence and Stochastic Ordering ; 3.1 Introduction ; 3.2 Concepts of Positive Dependence ; 3.3 Negative Dependence for More than Two Variables ; 3.4 Setwise Dependence ; 3.5 Other Approaches3.6 Positive Dependence Orderings 3.7 Bayesian Approach to Stochastic Dependence ; Chapter 4 Copulas ; 4.1 Introduction ; 4.2 Definition and Some Properties ; 4.3 The Frechet Bounds ; 4.4 Examples ; 4.5 Construction of a Copula ; 4.6 Archimedean Copulas ; 4.7 Archimax Copulas4.8 Copulas with Discontinuity Constraints 4.9 Copulas with More than Two Variables ; 4.10 Simulation Procedures ; Chapter 5 Farlie-Gumbel-Morgenstern Models of Dependence ; 5.1 Introduction ; 5.2 Initial Definition ; 5.3 Regression and Correlation ; 5.4 Iterations5.5 Dependence Properties 5.6 A Class of n-variate FGM Distributions ; 5.7 Further Extensions ; 5.8 FGM Sequences ; Chapter 6 Global Versus Local Dependence between Random Variables ; 6.1 Introduction ; 6.2 Global Measures of Dependence ; 6.3 Local Indices of Dependence6.4 Non-parametric Estimation of Local Indices The concept of dependence permeates the Earth and its inhabitants in a most profound manner. Examples of interdependent meteorological phenomena in nature and interdependence in the medical, social, and political aspects of our existence, not to mention the economic structures, are too numerous to be cited individually. Moreover, the dependence is obviously not deterministic but of a stochastic nature. However, it seems that none of the departments of statistics, engineering, economics and mathematics in the academic institutions throughout the world offer courses dealing with <i>dependence cCorrelation (Statistics)Dependence (Statistics)Correlation (Statistics)Dependence (Statistics)519.2Mari Dominique Drouet451215Kotz Samuel12052MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910782123203321Correlation and dependence671852UNINA04167nam 2200721 450 991082444590332120240131145334.00-8047-9229-110.1515/9780804792295(CKB)3710000000199215(SSID)ssj0001267608(PQKBManifestationID)12525892(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001267608(PQKBWorkID)11264397(PQKB)10341033(MiAaPQ)EBC1742618(DE-B1597)564622(DE-B1597)9780804792295(Au-PeEL)EBL1742618(CaPaEBR)ebr10895703(OCoLC)923709169(OCoLC)1178769672(EXLCZ)99371000000019921520140731h20142014 uy 0engurcnu||||||||txtccrExplanation and progress in security studiesbridging paradigm divides in international relationsStanford, CaliforniaStanford University Press2014©20141 online resource (324 pages)Stanford Security StudiesBibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph0-8047-9095-7 0-8047-9226-7 Includes bibliographical references and index.Front matter --Contents --Preface --Introduction --1. Traditions of Explanation and the Idea of Scientific Progress --2. Explanation in the Natural and Social Sciences --3. The Nuclear Proliferation Debate --4. The Balance-of-Power Debate --5. The Democratic Peace Debate --6. Analysis, Alternatives, Conclusion --Notes --References --IndexExplanation and Progress in Security Studies asks why Security Studies, as a central area of International Relations, has not experienced scientific progress in the way natural sciences have—and answers by arguing that the underlying reason is that scholars in Security Studies have advanced a range of different notions of "explanation" or different criteria of "explanatory superiority" to show that their positions are better than rival positions. To demonstrate this, the author engages in in-depth content analysis of the generally recognized exemplars of explanation and explanatory superiority in three of the core debates in the disciplines: Why do states pursue policies of nuclear proliferation? Why do states choose to form the alliances they do? And why do liberal democratic states behave the way they do toward other liberal democracies? The book reveals that authors in the debates that have shown the most progress use similar criteria in arguing for and against the key explanations. In the nuclear proliferation debate, there is wide divergence in the criteria the most visible authors use, and there is wide divergence in the explanations offered. In the alliance formation/balance-of-power debate, there is some overlap of criteria the most important authors use, and there has been some limited movement toward consensus. In the democratic peace debate there has been much more overlap of criteria the most prominent authors use, and there is agreement on both some positive and negative conclusions.International relationsMethodologyFBCInternational relationsPhilosophyFBCSecurity, InternationalFBCInternationale relationerFBCInternational sikkerhedFBCExplanationInternational relationsMethodology.International relationsPhilosophy.Security, International.Internationale relationerInternational sikkerhedExplanation.327.101zChernoff Fred, authttp://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut1533107Chernoff Fred1533107MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910824445903321Explanation and progress in security studies4039838UNINA