02680nam 2200649 450 991082410450332120230803205237.00-262-32319-2(CKB)3710000000243936(OCoLC)891137647(MdBmJHUP)muse41605(SSID)ssj0001347035(PQKBManifestationID)11805283(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001347035(PQKBWorkID)11343503(PQKB)10686470(StDuBDS)EDZ0000985785(MiAaPQ)EBC3339863(OCoLC)891137647(OCoLC)1055355803(OCoLC)1066591069(OCoLC)1081209062(OCoLC-P)891137647(MaCbMITP)9638(Au-PeEL)EBL3339863(CaPaEBR)ebr10934555(CaONFJC)MIL646386(EXLCZ)99371000000024393620141001h20142014 uy 0engur|||||||nn|nrdacontentrdamediardacarrierAgreement and its failures /Omer PremingerCambridge, Massachusetts :The MIT Press,2014.©20141 online resource (pages cm.)Linguistic Inquiry MonographsBibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph1-322-15131-8 0-262-52617-4 Includes bibliographical references and index.This monograph shows that the typically obligatory nature of predicate-argument agreement in phi-features (phi-agreement) cannot be captured through 'derivational time-bombs' - elements of the initial representation that cannot be part of a well-formed, end-of-the-derivation structure, and which are eliminated by the application of phi-agreement itself. This includes, but is not limited to, the 'uninterpretable features' of Chomsky 2000, 2001. Instead, it requires recourse to an operation - one whose invocation is obligatory, but whose successful culmination is not enforced by the grammar.Linguistic inquiry monographs.Grammar, Comparative and generalAgreementGrammar, Comparative and generalCaseGrammar, Comparative and generalSyntaxGrammar, Comparative and generalAgreement.Grammar, Comparative and generalCase.Grammar, Comparative and generalSyntax.415Preminger Omer1976-1596375MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910824104503321Agreement and its failures3917721UNINA