03051nam0 2200577 i 450 CFI049011220231121125453.088712517768885913199IT2000-12980 20010412d2000 ||||0itac50 baitaitz01i xxxe z01nDai casali alla fabbrica di San Pietroi Leniuomini d'affari del RinascimentoIvana Ait, Manuel Vaquero PiñeiroRomaRoma nel RinascimentoMinistero per i beni e le attività culturali, Ufficio centrale per i beni archivistici2000337 p.24 cmPubblicazioni degli archivi di Stato. Saggi59R.R. inedita17Segue: Appendice.001CFI00240622001 Pubblicazioni degli archivi di Stato. Saggi59001UMC09784662001 R.R. inedita17Materiali da costruzioneFIRRMLC046707IRomaSan PietroFIRRMLC061376ILeni <famiglia>Attivita commercialeSec. 13.-16.FIRRMLC164453ILeni, GiulianoFIRRMLC166290ICommercioRomaSec. 13.-16.FIRRMLC166292I380.1094563221Ait, IvanaRMSV020932070450993Vaquero Piñeiro, ManuelNAPV039194070473936ITIT-0120010412IT-RM028 IT-RM0289 IT-RM0290 IT-RM0313 IT-RM0281 IT-RM0459 IT-RM0211 IT-RM0830 IT-RM0251 IT-RM0460 IT-RM1163 IT-RM0151 IT-FR0017 Biblioteca Universitaria AlessandrinaRM028 Biblioteca Statale A. BaldiniRM0289 BIBLIOTECA ANGELICARM0290 BIBLIOTECA CASANATENSERM0313 BIBLIOTECA VALLICELLIANARM0281 ARCHIVIO DI STATO DI ROMARM0459 Fondazione Marco BessoRM0211 Biblioteca della Direzione Generale ArchiviRM0830 Biblioteca Della Soprintendenza Archivistica Per Il LazioRM0251 Biblioteca Dell' Archivio Centrale Dello StatoRM0460 Shttp://2.42.228.123/dgagaeta/pdf.php?file=Saggi/5b97722f464a7.pdfIstituto Centrale Restauro Conservazione Patrimonio Archivistico LibrarioRM1163 Biblioteca Istituto Storico Italiano Medio Evo - IRM0151 Biblioteca umanistica Giorgio ApreaFR0017 NCFI0490112Biblioteca umanistica Giorgio Aprea 52SALA BRAGAA4 (59) 52SBA0000209845 VMN RS A 2016070520160705 01 04 06 07 08 12 14 20 24 27 36 41 52Dai casali alla fabbrica di San Pietro1458051UNICAS05142nam 2200769 450 991082273610332120230328235014.00-8203-4553-90-8203-4656-X(CKB)2550000001126092(SSID)ssj0001001306(PQKBManifestationID)11540205(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001001306(PQKBWorkID)10967033(PQKB)10204940(MiAaPQ)EBC1441672(OCoLC)859536854(MdBmJHUP)muse32051(Au-PeEL)EBL1441672(CaPaEBR)ebr10775352(CaONFJC)MIL526732(EXLCZ)99255000000112609220130128d2013 uy| 0engurcnu||||||||txtccrRed, white, & black make blue indigo in the fabric of colonial South Carolina life /Andrea FeeserFirst edition.Athens, Georgia :University of Georgia Press,[2013]©20131 online resource (161 pages) mapsBibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph0-8203-3817-6 1-299-95481-2 Includes bibliographical references and index.Why South Carolina indigo? -- South Carolina indigo in British and Colonial wear -- South Carolina indigo in British textiles for the home and Colonial market -- South Carolina indigo in the dress of slaves and sovereign Indians -- Indigo cultivation and production in South Carolina -- Botanists, merchants, and planters in South Carolina : investments in indigo -- The role of indigo in native-colonist struggles over land and goods -- Producing South Carolina indigo: colonial planters and the skilled labor of slaves -- Indigo plantation histories -- Indigo and an East Florida plantation: overseer Indian Johnson walks away -- Slave John Williams: a key contributor to the Lucas-Pinckney indigo concern -- Conclusion. South Carolina indigo: a history of color.Like cotton, indigo has defied its humble origins. Left alone it might have been a regional plant with minimal reach, a localized way of dyeing textiles, paper, and other goods with a bit of blue. But when blue became the most popular color for the textiles that Britain turned out in large quantities in the eighteenth century, the South Carolina indigo that colored most of this cloth became a major component in transatlantic commodity chains. In Red, White, and Black Make Blue, Andrea Feeser tells the stories of all the peoples who made indigo a key part of the colonial South Carolina experience as she explores indigo's relationships to land use, slave labor, textile production and use, sartorial expression, and fortune building. In the eighteenth century, indigo played a central role in the development of South Carolina. The popularity of the color blue among the upper and lower classes ensured a high demand for indigo, and the climate in the region proved sound for its cultivation. Cheap labor by slaves--both black and Native American--made commoditization of indigo possible. And due to land grabs by colonists from the enslaved or expelled indigenous peoples, the expansion into the backcountry made plenty of land available on which to cultivate the crop. Feeser recounts specific histories--uncovered for the first time during her research--of how the Native Americans and African slaves made the success of indigo in South Carolina possible. She also emphasizes the material culture around particular objects, including maps, prints, paintings, and clothing. Red, White, and Black Make Blue is a fraught and compelling history of both exploitation and empowerment, revealing the legacy of a modest plant with an outsized impact.Red, white, and black make blueIndigo industrySouth CarolinaHistory18th centuryIndigoSouth CarolinaPlantation lifeSouth CarolinaHistory18th centuryPlantation ownersSouth CarolinaHistory18th centuryEnslaved personsSouth CarolinaHistory18th centuryAfrican AmericansSouth CarolinaHistory18th centuryTextile fabricsHistory18th centuryClothing and dressSocial aspectsHistory18th centurySouth CarolinaHistoryColonial period, ca. 1600-1775South CarolinaRace relationsHistory18th centuryIndigo industryHistoryIndigoPlantation lifeHistoryPlantation ownersHistoryEnslaved personsHistoryAfrican AmericansHistoryTextile fabricsHistoryClothing and dressSocial aspectsHistory667/.26Feeser Andrea1724433MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910822736103321Red, white, & black make blue4126546UNINA