00849nam0 2200229 450 00002066320180703152124.020081217d1908----km-y0itay50------bay-------001yyAppunti sull'esercizio economico degli apparati motoricorso complementare macchinisti 1907-908parte 2.Cesare BeriniLivornoTipo-litografia della R. Accademia Navale1908529 p.25 cmmanoscrittoAppunti sull'esercizio economico degli apparati motori47624Navigazione623.87219Berini,Cesare340845ITUNIPARTHENOPE20081217RICAUNIMARC000020663623.872/104 (2) As. i.PIST2008Appunti sull'esercizio economico degli apparati motori47624UNIPARTHENOPE05219nam 2200685 450 991082223070332120230721031256.01-281-35726-X97866113572901-84731-396-5(CKB)1000000000413325(EBL)342896(OCoLC)476157059(SSID)ssj0000181171(PQKBManifestationID)12011499(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000181171(PQKBWorkID)10150369(PQKB)10048523(MiAaPQ)EBC1772601(MiAaPQ)EBC5327617(MiAaPQ)EBC342896(Au-PeEL)EBL342896(EXLCZ)99100000000041332520180528d2007 uy 0engur|n|---|||||txtccrInternational domain name law ICANN and the UDRP /David Lindsay1st ed.Oxford ;Prortland, Oregon :Hart Publishing,[2007]©20071 online resource (556 p.)Description based upon print version of record.1-84113-584-4 Includes bibliographical references (pages [471]-473) and index.Half title page; TItle page; Title verso; Foreword; Preface; Acknowledgements; Contents; List of Abbreviations; Table of Cases and Domain Name Decisions; 1 The Domain Name System; [1.1] The Internet; [1.2] TCP/IP; [1.3] Internet Standards; [1.4] Internet Naming and Addressing; [1.5] IP Addresses; [1.6] IPv6; [1.7] The Domain Name System (DNS); [1.8] The Domain Name Space; [1.9] Top-level Domains (TLDs); [1.10] Original Generic Top-level Domains (gTLDs); [1.11] Country Code Top-level Domains (ccTLDs); [1.12] Commercialisation of the Internet; [1.13] New Generic Top-level Domains (gTLDs)As[1.14] New Sponsored TLDs (sTLDs)[1.15] Policy on Introducing New gTLDs; [1.16] Name Servers; [1.17] Root Name Servers and the Root Zone File; [1.18] Name Resolvers; [1.19] Resource Records; [1.20] Mapping Addresses to Domain Names; [1.21] The WHOIS Directory Service; [1.22] BIND; 2 DNS Governance and ICANN; 3 Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution; 4 UDRP Procedures; [4.1] The UDRP Rules; [4.2] Precedential Value of Panel Decisions; [4.3] The Complainant; [4.4] The Complaint; [4.5] Serving the Respondent; [4.6] The Respondent; [4.7] The Response; [4.8] Late Responses[4.9] The Panel and Panel Decisions[4.10] Choice of Law; [4.11] Proper Language of the Proceedings; [4.12] Supplemental Submissions; [4.13] Refiled Complaints; [4.14] Burden of Proof; [4.15] Independent Research by UDRP Panels; [4.16] Default Rules; [4.17] Reverse Domain Name Hijacking; [4.18] Equitable Doctrines and Defences; 5 Identical or Confusingly Similar Domain Names; [5.1] Overview; [5.2] Trade Mark; [5.3] Early History of Trade Mark Law; [5.4] Legislative Definitions of 'Trade Mark'; [5.5] 'Trade Mark' in the Union Label Case; [5.6] Service Mark[5.7] Common Law Trade Marks and Passing Off[5.8] The US Unfair Competition Tort; [5.9] Unregistered Marks in Civil Law; [5.10] Registered Trade Marks under the UDRP; [5.11] Collective and Certification Marks; [5.12] Location of Jurisdiction of Registration; [5.13] Registration where Full Rights not Granted; [5.14] Applications for Registration; [5.15] Time at Which Rights Arise under the UDRP; [5.16] Unregistered Marks under the UDRP; [5.17] Unregistered Marks: Civil Law Jurisdictions; [5.18] Common Law Rights under US Law; [5.19] 'Common Law Rights' under English Law; [5.20] Personal Names[5.21] Geographical Terms[5.22] Licensees and Other Non-exclusive Rights; [5.23] Comparing Marks under National Laws; [5.24] The Requirement of Use as a Trade Mark; [5.25] Comparing Marks under the UDRP; [5.26] Literal Comparison or Source Confusion; [5.27] Web Site Content Irrelevant in Confusion; [5.28] Elements to be Ignored in Comparison; [5.29] Graphical or Design Elements; [5.30] Identicality; [5.31] 'Essential or Virtual Identity is Sufficient'; [5.32] Addition of Terms does not Dispel Confusion; [5.33] Addition of Generic 'Internet' Terms; [5.34] 'Typosquatting'[5.35] Gripe Sites and ConfusionThe Domain Name System (DNS), which matches computer addresses to human-friendly domain names, has given rise to many legal issues. Two important issues are - arrangements for governing the DNS, and the use of trade marks as domain names. This book examines the extent to which principles of national trade mark law have been used in UDRP decisions.Internet domain namesLaw and legislationTrademarks (International law)Internet domain namesInternet domain namesLaw and legislation.Trademarks (International law)Internet domain names.343.09944346.048Lindsay David1959-1622511MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910822230703321International domain name law3956407UNINA02627nam 2200577z- 450 99654035340331620231214133456.0(CKB)4920000000095310(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/44600(EXLCZ)99492000000009531020202102d2019 |y 0engurmn|---annantxtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierDeceptive Conducts before the Patent OfficeChallenges for Patent Law and Competition LawNomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG20191 electronic resource (335 p.)Munich Intellectual Property Law Center – MIPLC3-8487-6134-3 3-7489-0257-3 In an increasingly harmonized global patent landscape, few issues still distinguish the US patent system as much as its strict–and often criticized–duty of candor and its inequitable conduct doctrine. The EPO and most other countries around the world impose less burdensome disclosure duties upon patent applicants. What is there to learn from the experience in the US? Have these tools resulted in any benefit worth considering? Yet regardless of the disclosure duties imposed upon patent applicants, a deceptive conduct before the Patent Office could lead to unwarranted exclusive rights and have a negative impact on competition. Should antitrust law intervene? Is it a case of sham litigation? This work attempts to answer those questions through a comparative analysis, examining the law and case law in the US and in the EU from both a patent and a competition law perspective and seeking a workable theory of harm.pharmazeutischer Patientirreführendes VerhaltenWettbewerbsrechtPatentanmeldungPatentamthigh courtSupreme Courtinequitable conductCompetition Lawkristalline FormPatentrechtApotexWalker Processtert-Butylaminsalzduty of candorFraud before the Patent OfficePerindoprilScheincharakterAstraZenecaPatent OfficeServierLJ Jacobpatent lawHoss Eugenioauth1287687BOOK996540353403316Deceptive Conducts before the Patent Office3020297UNISA