04503nam 2200757Ia 450 991082215410332120230802005149.00-292-73570-710.7560/735699(CKB)2550000000103478(OCoLC)794672970(CaPaEBR)ebrary10565387(SSID)ssj0000658073(PQKBManifestationID)11384847(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000658073(PQKBWorkID)10680914(PQKB)10414223(MdBmJHUP)muse17572(Au-PeEL)EBL3443594(CaPaEBR)ebr10565387(OCoLC)932314035(MiAaPQ)EBC3443594(DE-B1597)588667(DE-B1597)9780292735705(EXLCZ)99255000000010347820110926d2012 ub 0engurcn|||||||||txtccrPower, institutions, and leadership in war and peace[electronic resource] lessons from Peru and Ecuador, 1995/1998 /David R. Mares and David Scott Palmer1st ed.Austin University of Texas Press20121 online resource (201 p.) Bibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph0-292-73569-3 Includes bibliographical references and index.Introduction: explaining interstate conflict and boundary disputes in post/Cold War Latin America -- Two nations in conflict -- Presidential decision making: the institutional and personal context -- Domestic politics and the push toward war -- The domestic bases for resolution -- Hemispheric diplomacy and the politics of a solution -- Conclusions: lessons learned, progress achieved, and implications for other boundary disputes -- Appendix A. Effective number of parties -- Appendix B. Ecuadorean attitudes toward relations with Peru (november 1992) -- Appendix C. Polling data on border issues (1994/1996).In January 1995, fighting broke out between Ecuadorian and Peruvian military forces in a remote section of the Amazon. It took more than three years and the interplay of multiple actors and factors to achieve a definitive peace agreement, thus ending what had been the region's oldest unresolved border dispute. This conflict and its resolution provide insights about other unresolved and/or disputed land and sea boundaries which involve almost every country in the Western Hemisphere. Drawing on extensive field research at the time of the dispute and during its aftermath, including interviews with high-ranking diplomats and military officials, Power, Institutions, and Leadership in War and Peace is the first book-length study to relate this complex border dispute and its resolution to broader theories of conflict. The findings emphasize an emerging leadership approach in which individuals are not mere captives of power and institutions. In addition, the authors illuminate an overlap in national and international arenas in shaping effective articulation, perception, and selection of policy. In the “new” democratic Latin America that emerged in the late 1970s through the early 1990s, historical memory remains influential in shaping the context of disputes, in spite of presumed U.S. post–Cold War influence. This study offers important, broader perspectives on a hemisphere still rife with boundary disputes as a rising number of people and products (including arms) pass through these borderlands.Boundary disputesCase studiesPolitical leadershipCase studiesPolitical leadershipEcuadorPolitical leadershipPeruPolitics and warCase studiesPolitics and warEcuadorPolitics and warPeruEcuadorBoundariesPeruPeruBoundariesEcuadorBoundary disputesPolitical leadershipPolitical leadershipPolitical leadershipPolitics and warPolitics and warPolitics and war355.02Mares David R596021Palmer David Scott1937-1598917MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910822154103321Power, institutions, and leadership in war and peace3921422UNINA