05091nam 2200709 450 991082152230332120230803023009.01-5231-0855-X0-643-10836-X1-306-20823-8(CKB)2550000001193013(EBL)1578677(OCoLC)839545444(SSID)ssj0001159651(PQKBManifestationID)11793532(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001159651(PQKBWorkID)11113809(PQKB)10185494(Au-PeEL)EBL1578677(CaPaEBR)ebr10818429(CaONFJC)MIL552074(MiAaPQ)EBC1578677(EXLCZ)99255000000119301320131228h20132013 uy| 0engur|n|---|||||txtccrGuidelines for evaluating water in pit slope stability /editors, Geoff Beale and John ReadCollingwood :CSIRO Publishing,[2013]©20131 online resource (615 p.)Description based upon print version of record.0-643-10837-8 0-643-10835-1 Includes bibliographical references and index.Cover; Contents; Preface and acknowledgements; INTRODUCTION; 1 Scope of LOP projecthydrogeological studies; 2 General impact of water onmining; 2.1 Water management issues; 2.2 Consequences of mining below thewater table; 2.3 General goals for the water-controlprogram; 3 Cost of managing water in slopestability; 3.1 Introduction; 3.2 Cost-benefit analysis; 3.3 An example of managing earlydewatering costs; 3.4 An example of large-scale cost-benefitanalysis for pit slope depressurisation; 4 Goals of managing water inslope stability; 4.1 Opportunities; 4.2 Passive pore pressure control4.3 Active pore pressure control4.4 Making the decision to implement anactive program; 5 General planning for mine watermanagement; 1FRAMEWORK: ASSESSING WATER IN SLOPE STABILITY; 1.1 Fundamental parameters; 1.1.1 Porosity and storage properties; 1.1.2 Permeability and transportproperties; 1.1.3 Pore pressure; 1.1.4 Head and pressure conditions; 1.1.5 Controls on pore pressure; 1.1.6 The role of water pressure in slopestability; 1.2 The hydrogeological model; 1.2.1 Basic regimes; 1.2.2 Geology; 1.2.3 Hydrology; 1.2.4 Hydraulic controls; 1.3 Managing water in open pitmines1.3.1 Key factors affecting the water managementprogram1.3.2 General mine dewatering; 1.3.3 Pit slope depressurisation andgeneral mine dewatering; 1.3.4 Steps required for implementing aslope depressurisation program; 1.3.5 Mine water balance; 1.3.6 Mine closure considerations; 2SITE CHARACTERISATION; 2.1 Planning field programs; 2.1.1 Introduction; 2.1.2 Scale of the investigation; 2.1.3 Early-stage investigation; 2.1.4 Integrating the design process; 2.1.5 Required effort based on projectlevel; 2.1.6 Planning for a Greenfield minedevelopment; 2.1.7 Planning for a Brownfield sitedevelopment2.1.8 Environmental baseline studies2.1.9 Water management practices duringthe field investigation program; 2.2 Implementing field programs; 2.2.1 Background; 2.2.2 Drilling methods; 2.2.3 'Piggy-backing' of data collection; 2.2.4 Dedicated hydrogeological drillingprograms; 2.2.5 Single-hole testing methods; 2.2.6 Monitoring installations; 2.2.7 Downhole geophysical logging; 2.2.8 Cross-hole and multi-hole testing; 2.2.9 Water quality testing; 2.2.10 Pilot drainage trials; 2.3 Presentation, analysis andstorage of data; 2.3.1 Types of data; 2.3.2 Display of time-series monitoringdata2.3.3 Analysis of one-off data2.3.4 Levels of data analysis for a typicaldevelopment program; 2.3.5 Databases; 3 PREPARING A CONCEPTUALHYDROGEOLOGICAL MODEL; 3.1 Introduction; 3.1.1 Background; 3.1.2 What is a conceptual model?; 3.1.3 Development of a sector-scale model; 3.1.4 Available data; 3.2 Components of the conceptualmodel; 3.2.1 Components of a larger scaleconceptual model; 3.2.2 The 'A-B-C-D' concept of fractureflow; 3.2.3 Components of the sector-scaleconceptual model; 3.3 Research outcomes from Diavik; 3.3.1 Background; 3.3.2 Diavik site setting; 3.3.3 Effects of blasting3.3.4 Influence of freeze-backDetails the hydrogeological procedures that should be followed when performing open pit slope stability design studies.Strip miningPlanningStrip miningDesign and constructionSlopes (Soil mechanics)LandslidesStrip miningPlanning.Strip miningDesign and construction.Slopes (Soil mechanics)Landslides.628.505Beale Geoff1715091Read John475778MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910821522303321Guidelines for evaluating water in pit slope stability4109397UNINA