04640nam 2200661 450 991082120920332120230607222640.01-283-59200-297866139044540-8135-4247-210.36019/9780813542478(CKB)1000000000748062(EBL)435049(OCoLC)609837385(SSID)ssj0000357197(PQKBManifestationID)11263397(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000357197(PQKBWorkID)10352861(PQKB)10265670(MdBmJHUP)muse21413(DE-B1597)530329(DE-B1597)9780813542478(MiAaPQ)EBC435049(Au-PeEL)EBL435049(CaONFJC)MIL390445(EXLCZ)99100000000074806220151016h20022002 uy 0engur|nu---|u||utxtccrBiology at work rethinking sexual equality /Kingsley R. BrowneNew Brunswick, New Jersey ;London, [England] :Rutgers University Press,2002.©20021 online resource (295 p.)Rutgers Series in Human EvolutionDescription based upon print version of record.0-8135-3053-9 Includes bibliographical references and index.Front matter --Contents --Acknowledgments --1. Introduction --2. Sex Differences in Temperament --3. Sex Differences in Cognitive Abilities --4. Once One Breaks the Glass Ceiling, Does It Still Exist? --5. Occupational Segregation --6. The Gender Gap in Compensation --7. Why Socialization Is an Inadequate Explanation --8. Hormones --9. Evolutionary Theory and the Ultimate Cause of Biological Sex Differences --10. Difference or Disadvantage? --11. A Thumb on the Scales --12. Mitigating Work /Family Conflict --13. Sexual Harassment --14. Conclusion --Notes --Bibliography --Index --About the AuthorDoes biology help explain why women, on average, earn less money than men? Is there any evolutionary basis for the scarcity of female CEOs in Fortune 500 companies? According to Kingsley Browne, the answer may be yes. Biology at Work brings an evolutionary perspective to bear on issues of women in the workplace: the "glass ceiling," the "gender gap" in pay, sexual harassment, and occupational segregation. While acknowledging the role of discrimination and sexist socialization, Browne suggests that until we factor real biological differences between men and women into the equation, the explanation remains incomplete. Browne looks at behavioral differences between men and women as products of different evolutionary pressures facing them throughout human history. Women's biological investment in their offspring has led them to be on average more nurturing and risk averse, and to value relationships over competition. Men have been biologically rewarded, over human history, for displays of strength and skill, risk taking, and status acquisition. These behavioral differences have numerous workplace consequences. Not surprisingly, sex differences in the drive for status lead to sex differences in the achievement of status. Browne argues that decision makers should recognize that policies based on the assumption of a single androgynous human nature are unlikely to be successful. Simply removing barriers to inequality will not achieve equality, as women and men typically value different things in the workplace and will make different workplace choices based on their different preferences. Rather than simply putting forward the "nature" side of the debate, Browne suggests that dichotomies such as nature/nurture have impeded our understanding of the origins of human behavior. Through evolutionary biology we can understand not only how natural selection has created predispositions toward certain types of behavior but also how the social environment interacts with these predispositions to produce observed behavioral patterns.Rutgers series in human evolution.Sex differences (Psychology)Sexual division of laborSex differencesSex differences (Psychology)Sexual division of labor.Sex differences.305.3Browne Kingsley1691797MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910821209203321Biology at work4068465UNINA