02802nam 2200613 a 450 991082044930332120240516083603.01-282-76348-29786612763489981-4295-26-4(CKB)2490000000001923(EBL)731280(OCoLC)670429586(SSID)ssj0000422261(PQKBManifestationID)11306852(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000422261(PQKBWorkID)10416591(PQKB)10127380(MiAaPQ)EBC731280(WSP)00007626(Au-PeEL)EBL731280(CaPaEBR)ebr10422542(CaONFJC)MIL276348(EXLCZ)99249000000000192320100408d2010 uy 0engur|n|---|||||txtccrLocating the industrial revolution inducement and response /Eric L. Jones1st ed.Singapore ;Hackensack, NJ World Scientificc20101 online resource (280 p.)Description based upon print version of record.981-4295-25-6 Includes bibliographical references and index.The view from Little England -- The anomaly of the South -- Scarce resources? -- Possible explanations -- Further possibilities -- Prosperity, poverty and bourgeois values -- De-industrialisation and the landed system -- Politics and ideas -- Transport and marketing -- The pace of change -- North and South.The familiar industrialisation of northern England and less familiar de-industrialisation of the south are shown to have depended on a common process. Neither rise nor decline resulted from differences in natural resource endowments, since they began before the use of coal and steam in manufacturing. Instead, political certainty, competitive ideology and Enlightenment optimism encouraged investment in transport and communications. This integrated the national market, intensifying competition between regions and altering economic distributions. Despite a dysfunctional landed system, agriculturaIndustrializationEnglandHistoryEconomic developmentEnglandHistoryEngland, NorthernEconomic conditionsRegional disparitiesEngland, SouthernEconomic conditionsRegional disparitiesIndustrializationHistory.Economic developmentHistory.330.942/08Jones E. L(Eric Lionel)110935MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910820449303321Locating the industrial revolution3941290UNINA