04164oam 2200589 450 991082028420332120240131143554.01-135-07827-00-203-06719-31-299-14111-01-135-07828-910.4324/9780203067192(OCoLC)891387603(MiFhGG)GVRL8PUQ(EXLCZ)99267000000033127820121026d2013 uy 0engurun|---uuuuatxtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierPost-Kyoto climate governance confronting the politics of scale, ideology, and knowledge /Asim ZiaAbingdon, Oxon :Routledge,2013.1 online resource (xix, 201 pages) illustrationsRoutledge studies in ecological economics ;27Description based upon print version of record.1-138-90119-9 0-415-60125-8 Includes bibliographical references and index.Introduction : post-Kyoto climate governance -- The politics of scale I : temporal and spatial discounting -- The politics of scale II : synergies and trade-offs in complex systems -- The politics of ideology I : risk perceptions and psychology of denial -- The politics of ideology II : communicating uncertain climate change risk -- The politics of knowledge I : marketization of climate governance -- The politics of knowledge II : accountability and adaptation -- Governing environmental complexity.In the midst of human-induced global climate change, powerful industrialized nations and rapidly industrializing nations are still heavily dependent on fossil fuels. Even if we arrive at a Hubbert's peak for oil extraction in the 21st century, the availability of technologically recoverable coal and natural gas will mean that fossil fuels continue to be burned for many years to come, and our civilization will have to deal with the consequences far into the future. Climate change will not discriminate between rich and poor nations, and yet the UN-driven process of negotiating a global climate governance regime has hit serious roadblocks. This book takes a trans-disciplinary perspective to identify the causes of failure in developing an international climate policy regime and lays out a roadmap for developing a post-Kyoto (post-2012) climate governance regime in the light of lessons learned from the Kyoto phase. Three critical policy analytical lenses are used to evaluate the inherent complexity of designing post-Kyoto climate policy: the politics of scale; the politics of ideology; and the politics of knowledge. The politics of scale lens focuses on the theme of temporal and spatial discounting observed in human societies and how it impacts the allocation of environmental commons and natural resources across space and time. The politics of ideology lens focuses on the themes of risk and uncertainty perception in complex, pluralistic human societies. The politics of knowledge lens focuses on the themes of knowledge and power dynamics in terms of governance and policy designs, such as marketization of climate governance observed in the Kyoto institutional regime.Routledge studies in ecological economics ;27.Environmental policyClimate change mitigationGovernment policyClimatic changesPolitical aspectsGreenhouse gasesPolitical aspectsGlobal temperature changesNatureEffect of human beings onEnvironmental policy.Climate change mitigationGovernment policy.Climatic changesPolitical aspects.Greenhouse gasesPolitical aspects.Global temperature changes.NatureEffect of human beings on.363.738/74561Zia Asim.1710890MiFhGGMiFhGGBOOK9910820284203321Post-Kyoto climate governance4101824UNINA