04319nam 2200733 a 450 991082003500332120200520144314.01-282-08674-X97866120867481-4008-2802-310.1515/9781400828029(CKB)1000000000773403(EBL)445551(OCoLC)437140514(SSID)ssj0000341019(PQKBManifestationID)11268487(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000341019(PQKBWorkID)10389552(PQKB)10033159(MdBmJHUP)muse36504(DE-B1597)446617(OCoLC)979910696(DE-B1597)9781400828029(Au-PeEL)EBL445551(CaPaEBR)ebr10284179(CaONFJC)MIL208674(MiAaPQ)EBC445551(EXLCZ)99100000000077340320070226d2007 uy 0engurcn|||||||||txtccrNuclear logics contrasting paths in East Asia and the Middle East /Etel SolingenCourse BookPrinceton Princeton University Pressc20071 online resource (420 p.)Princeton studies in international history and politicsDescription based upon print version of record.0-691-13147-3 0-691-13468-5 Includes bibliographical references (p. [351]-383) and index.Front matter --Contents --Preface --Part I. Introduction and Conceptual Framework --Part II. East Asia: Denuclearization as the Norm, Nuclearization as the Anomaly --Part III. The Middle East: Nuclearization as the Norm, Denuclearization as the Anomaly --Part IV. Conclusions --Notes --References --IndexNuclear Logics examines why some states seek nuclear weapons while others renounce them. Looking closely at nine cases in East Asia and the Middle East, Etel Solingen finds two distinct regional patterns. In East Asia, the norm since the late 1960's has been to forswear nuclear weapons, and North Korea, which makes no secret of its nuclear ambitions, is the anomaly. In the Middle East the opposite is the case, with Iran, Iraq, Israel, and Libya suspected of pursuing nuclear-weapons capabilities, with Egypt as the anomaly in recent decades. Identifying the domestic conditions underlying these divergent paths, Solingen argues that there are clear differences between states whose leaders advocate integration in the global economy and those that reject it. Among the former are countries like South Korea, Taiwan, and Japan, whose leaders have had stronger incentives to avoid the political, economic, and other costs of acquiring nuclear weapons. The latter, as in most cases in the Middle East, have had stronger incentives to exploit nuclear weapons as tools in nationalist platforms geared to helping their leaders survive in power. Solingen complements her bold argument with other logics explaining nuclear behavior, including security dilemmas, international norms and institutions, and the role of democracy and authoritarianism. Her account charts the most important frontier in understanding nuclear proliferation: grasping the relationship between internal and external political survival. Nuclear Logics is a pioneering book that is certain to provide an invaluable resource for researchers, teachers, and practitioners while reframing the policy debate surrounding nonproliferation.Princeton studies in international history and politics.Nuclear nonproliferationEast AsiaNuclear nonproliferationMiddle EastNuclear nonproliferationInternational cooperationSecurity, InternationalNuclear nonproliferationNuclear nonproliferationNuclear nonproliferationInternational cooperation.Security, International.355.02/1709589.76bclSolingen Etel1952-719941MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910820035003321Nuclear logics1398278UNINA