05443nam 2200637 a 450 991081900370332120240313232919.090-272-7194-1(CKB)2560000000105273(EBL)1211766(SSID)ssj0000887084(PQKBManifestationID)11465697(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000887084(PQKBWorkID)10840316(PQKB)11122676(MiAaPQ)EBC1211766(DLC) 2013011340(Au-PeEL)EBL1211766(CaPaEBR)ebr10718654(CaONFJC)MIL497457(OCoLC)830837636(EXLCZ)99256000000010527320130318d2013 uy 0engurcn|||||||||txtccrChallenging clitics /edited by Christine Meklenborg Salvesen, Hans Petter Helland1st ed.Amsterdam ;Philadelphia John Benjamins Pub. Co.20131 online resource (323 p.)Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today,0166-0829 ;v. 206Description based upon print version of record.90-272-5589-X Includes bibliographical references and index.Challenging Clitics; Editorial page; Title page; LCC data; Table of Contents; Acknowledgements; Acknowledgements; Why challenging clitics?; Some introductory remarks; Christine Meklenborg Salvesen & Hans Petter Helland; Why challenging clitics?; 1. Introduction; 2. Clitics as a linguistic object; 2.1 Words, clitics and affixes; 2.2 Simple clitics and special clitics; 2.3 The position of clitics; 2.4 Thematic arguments or functional heads?; 2.4.1 Clitics as D0s; 2.4.2 Clitics as functional heads; 2.5 Clitics and phases; 3. The subject cycle; 3.1 The subject pronoun in French4. The interest of this volume 4.1 The derivation of clitic structures; 4.2 Finiteness and phases; 4.3 Clitics in LFG; 4.4 Clitics in Distributed Morphology; 4.5 Slavic clitics and the TP projection; 4.6 Interrogative clitics; 4.7 Clitics or affixes?; 4.8 The acquisition of clitics; 4.9 Clitic clusters; 5. Conclusion; References; Enclisis at the syntax-PF interface; Marios Mavrogiorgos; Enclisis at the syntax-PF interface; 1. The proclisis-enclisis alternation; 1.1 Introduction; 1.2 Proclisis and enclisis in finiteness sensitive and Tobler-Mussafia languages; 1.2.1 Overview of the data1.2.2 Past analyses 2. V-movement analysis as a purely PF or syntactic account; 2.1 Against a pure PF account; 2.2 Against a pure syntactic account; 2.3 V-movement across the cliticization site: What is syntax and what is PF?; 3. V-movement to a V-related head: The role of PF; 3.1 The finiteness factor in finiteness sensitive languages; 3.2 Non-finite enclisis in Tobler-Mussafia languages; 3.3 Finite enclisis in Tobler-Mussafia languages; 4. Summary and conclusions; References; Clisis revisited; Root and embedded contexts in Western Iberian*; Francisco José Fernández-Rubiera; Clisis revisited1. Enclisis and proclisis in Western Iberian Romance languages 1.1 Enclisis and proclisis in the matrix context in Western Iberian Romance languages; 1.2 Enclisis and proclisis in the finite embedded context in Asturian; 2. Previous approaches to enclisis and proclisis alternations; 2.1 Phonological approaches to enclisis and proclisis alternations; 2.2 Syntactic approaches to enclisis and proclisis alternations; 3. The nature of clitics in Western Iberian Romance languages and the role of Finitenesso in deriving enclisis/proclisis alternations4. The edge-condition of Fino and its role in deriving enclisis/proclisis alternations in the matrix environment in Western Iberian Romance languages 4.1 Enclisis and the edge-condition of Fino; 4.2 Proclisis and the edge-condition of Fino; 4.3 The edge-condition of Fino and enclisis/proclisis alternations: A summary; 5. The edge-condition of Fino, the complementizer system and clitic placement alternations (or lack thereof) in the finite embedded context in Western Iberian; 5.1 Demonte and Fernández Soriano (2009): The que1 "that1" and the que2 "that2"5.2 Assertive predicates, selection, complementizers and enclisis/proclisis alternations in AsturianIn Old French, all clitic clusters containing objects observed the order ACC-DAT. During the 15th and 16th centuries this order was changed into DAT-ACC in cases where objects of the 1st and 2nd person were involved. This change took place rather abruptly. In this paper I will argue that increased use of reflexive forms provoked a change in the order in these clitic clusters. More specifically, I will argue that clusters involving 1st and 2nd person argumental clitics form true clusters in Modern French (in the sense of Pescarini (2012)), whereas they formed split clusters in the old language.Linguistik aktuell ;Bd. 206.Grammar, Comparative and generalCliticsGrammar, Comparative and generalClitics.415/.92Salvesen Christine Meklenborg1661062Helland Hans Petter1661063MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910819003703321Challenging clitics4016753UNINA