04557nam 2200745 450 991081783210332120230912140207.01-281-99458-897866119945871-4426-8285-X10.3138/9781442682856(CKB)2430000000001890(EBL)4672205(SSID)ssj0000312220(PQKBManifestationID)11242212(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000312220(PQKBWorkID)10331571(PQKB)11255951(CaBNvSL)thg00600983 (DE-B1597)465070(OCoLC)1013941216(OCoLC)944177351(DE-B1597)9781442682856(Au-PeEL)EBL4672205(CaPaEBR)ebr11257883(OCoLC)958559020(VaAlCD)20.500.12592/svcdxz(schport)gibson_crkn/2009-12-01/6/418467(MiAaPQ)EBC4672205(OCoLC)288144885(MdBmJHUP)musev2_105483(MiAaPQ)EBC3257937(EXLCZ)99243000000000189020160923h20032003 uy 0engur|n|---|||||txtccrUncommon readers Denis Donoghue, Frank Kermode, George Steiner and the tradition of the common reader /Christopher J. Knight2nd ed.Toronto, [Ontario] ;Buffalo, [New York] ;London, [England] :University of Toronto Press,2003.©20031 online resource (522 p.)Studies in Book and Print CultureDescription based upon print version of record.0-8020-8798-1 Includes bibliographical references and index.Denis Donoghue -- Frank Kermode -- George Steiner."Impressive in scope and erudition, Christopher Knight's Uncommon Readers focuses on three critics whose voices - mixing eloquence with pugnacity - stand out as among the most notable independent critics working during the last half-century. The critics are Denis Donoghue, Frank Kermode, and George Steiner, and their independence - a striking characteristic in a time of corporate criticism - is reflective of both their backgrounds (Donoghue's Catholic upbringing in Protestant-ruled Northern Ireland; Kermode's Manx beginnings; and Steiner's Jewish upbringing in pre-Holocaust Europe) and their temperaments. Each represents a party of one, a fact that has, on the one hand, made them the object of the occasional vituperative dismissal and, on the other, contributed to their influence and remarkable longevity." "Since the 1950s, Steiner, Donoghue, and Kermode have each maintained a highly public profile, regularly contributing to such influential publications as Encounter, New Yorker, New York Review of Books, Times Literary Supplement, and the London Review of Books. This aspect of their work receives particular attention in Uncommon Readers, for it illustrates a renewed interest in the role of the public critic, especially in relation to the genre of the literary-review essay, and signals a sustained conversation with an educated public - namely the common reader." "Knight makes the argument for the review essay as a serious and still viable genre, and he examines the three critics in light of this assumption. He expounds upon the critics' separate interests - Kermode's identification with discussions of canonicity, Steiner's with cultural politics, and Donoghue's with the persistent claims of the imagination - while also revealing the ways in which their work often reflects theological interests. Lastly, he attempts to adjudicate some of the conflicts that have arisen between these critics and other literary theorists (especially the post-structuralists), and to discuss the question of whether it is still possible for critics to work independently. Original and deliberative, Uncommon Readers presents a renewed defense of the tradition of the common reader."--Jacket.CriticismHistory20th centuryBook reviewingHistory20th centuryHistory.Electronic books. CriticismHistoryBook reviewingHistory801.950922Knight Christopher J.1952-1688464MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910817832103321Uncommon readers4095418UNINA