02590nam 2200457 a 450 991081714880332120230617032456.01-283-19223-397866131922330-567-04962-0(CKB)2670000000106780(EBL)742789(OCoLC)745866145(MiAaPQ)EBC742789(Au-PeEL)EBL742789(CaPaEBR)ebr10490349(CaONFJC)MIL319223(EXLCZ)99267000000010678020040520d2003 uy 0engur|n|---|||||The unity of the Corinthian correspondence[electronic resource] /David R. HallLondon ;New York T & T Clark Internationalc20031 online resource (293 p.)Journal for the study of the New Testament. Supplement series ;251Description based upon print version of record.0-567-08422-1 Includes bibliographical references and indexes.CONTENTS; Preface; Abbreviations; Introduction; Chapter 1; PAUL'S OPPONENTS IN 1 CORINTHIANS; Chapter 2; THE UNITY OF 1 CORINTHIANS; Chapter 3; THE SOCIAL BACKGROUND TO 1 CORINTHIANS; Chapter 4; THE UNITY OF 2 CORINTHIANS; Chapter 5; THE INTERNAL UNITY OF 2 CORINTHIANS 1-9; Chapter 6; THE BACKGROUND OF PAUL' S OPPONENTS; Chapter 7; THE TEACHING OF PAUL'S OPPONENTS; Chapter 8; THE QUESTION OF SELF-SUPPORT; Chapter 9; THE VOCABULARY OF PAUL'S OPPONENTS; Chapter 10; THE TEARFUL LETTER; Chapter 11; PAUL'S TRAVELS AND TRAVEL PLANS; Chapter 12; PAUL's PASTORAL STRATEGY; BibliographyIndex of ReferencesIndex of AuthorsThe thesis of this book is that 1 and 2 Corinthians are closely related; that Paul faces the same opponents in both letters; that the letter written with many tears referred to in 2 Corinthians is 1 Corinthians; and that there is no need to posit an intermediate visit or letter between the two canonical letters. Throughout the two letters Paul implements a consistent pastoral strategy, and an understanding of this strategy explains the difference in tone between various sections of the two letters. There is no need for theories of partition.Journal for the study of the New Testament.Supplement series ;251.227/.206Hall David R86645MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910817148803321The unity of the Corinthian correspondence4024646UNINA