03965nam 2200709 450 991081699470332120230807215717.00-292-77204-110.7560/772038(CKB)3710000000417107(EBL)3443749(SSID)ssj0001497226(PQKBManifestationID)11927543(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001497226(PQKBWorkID)11494465(PQKB)10179474(OCoLC)909948084(MdBmJHUP)muse43677(Au-PeEL)EBL3443749(CaPaEBR)ebr11056910(DE-B1597)587236(OCoLC)1286807414(DE-B1597)9780292772045(MiAaPQ)EBC3443749(EXLCZ)99371000000041710720150604h20152015 uy 0engur|n|---|||||txtccrPublic spending and democracy in Classical Athens /David M. PritchardFirst edition.Austin, Texas :University of Texas Press,2015.©20151 online resource (210 p.)Ashley and Peter Larkin Series in Greek and Roman CultureDescription based upon print version of record.0-292-77203-3 Includes bibliographical references and indexes.Public-spending debates -- The cost of festivals -- The cost of democracy -- The cost of war -- Conclusion : public-spending priorities.In his On the Glory of Athens, Plutarch complained that the Athenian people spent more on the production of dramatic festivals and “the misfortunes of Medeas and Electras than they did on maintaining their empire and fighting for their liberty against the Persians.” This view of the Athenians’ misplaced priorities became orthodoxy with the publication of August Böckh’s 1817 book Die Staatshaushaltung der Athener [The Public Economy of Athens], which criticized the classical Athenian dēmo s for spending more on festivals than on wars and for levying unjust taxes to pay for their bloated government. But were the Athenians’ priorities really as misplaced as ancient and modern historians believed? Drawing on lines of evidence not available in Böckh’s time, Public Spending and Democracy in Classical Athens calculates the real costs of religion, politics, and war to settle the long-standing debate about what the ancient Athenians valued most highly. David M. Pritchard explains that, in Athenian democracy, voters had full control over public spending. When they voted for a bill, they always knew its cost and how much they normally spent on such bills. Therefore, the sums they chose to spend on festivals, politics, and the armed forces reflected the order of the priorities that they had set for their state. By calculating these sums, Pritchard convincingly demonstrates that it was not religion or politics but war that was the overriding priority of the Athenian people.Ashley and Peter Larkin series in Greek and Roman culture.Finance, PublicGreeceAthensHistoryTo 1500DemocracyGreeceAthensHistoryTo 1500War and societyGreeceAthensHistoryTo 1500WarEconomic aspectsGreeceAthensHistoryTo 1500Athens (Greece)Appropriations and expendituresHistoryTo 1500Finance, PublicHistoryDemocracyHistoryWar and societyHistoryWarEconomic aspectsHistory336.3/909385NH 5850OBVrvkPritchard David1970-790415MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910816994703321Public spending and democracy in Classical Athens4119839UNINA