04606nam 2200637 450 991081680210332120230807203717.01-315-70045-X0-585-01990-8(CKB)111000211279346(EBL)2055062(SSID)ssj0000257211(PQKBManifestationID)12096082(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000257211(PQKBWorkID)10246658(PQKB)10201633(MiAaPQ)EBC3569136(EXLCZ)9911100021127934620150527h20151997 uy 0engur|n|---|||||txtccrTerminating public programs an American political paradox /Mark R. Daniels ; with a foreword by William V. Roth, JrOxfordshire, [England] ;New York, New York :Routledge,2015.©19971 online resource (124 p.)Description based upon print version of record.1-317-45890-7 0-7656-0124-9 Includes bibliographical references and index.Cover; Half Title; Title Page; Copyright Page; Dedication; Table of Contents; Tables and Figures; Foreword; Preface; 1. Public Policy and Organization Termination: An Overview; Defining Termination; Termination and the Public Policy Process; Reasons for Termination; Types of Policy Termination; Termination's Current Political Popularity; The Study of Public Policy and Organization Termination; Conclusion; 2. The Literature of Termination; The 1976 Policy Sciences Symposium; Herbert Kaufman and Organizational Death; Peter deLeon and the Politics of TerminationThe 1997 International Journal of Public Administration Symposium on TerminationConclusion; 3. Sunset Legislation: Exploring the Linkages Between Termination and Innovation; Sunset Legislation and the Federal Government; Sunset Legislation and State Governments; Termination and Innovation; Measuring Termination and Innovation; Testing Termination and Innovation; Conclusion; 4. Organizational Termination and Policy Continuation; The Death of Oklahoma's Public Training Schools; ""In Need of Treatment"" Adjudication; Medicaid and Juvenile ServicesEvaluating Hypotheses: Patterns and GeneralizationsConclusion; 5. Implementing Policy Termination; Implementing Policy Termination: TennCare; Testing Behn's Twelve Termination Guidelines; Hint 1: Don't Float Trial Balloons; Hint 2: Enlarge the Policy's Constituency; Hint 3: Focus Attention on the Policy's Harm; Hint 4: Take Advantage of Ideological Shifts to Demonstrate Harm; Hint 5: Inhibit Compromise; Hint 6: Recruit an Outsider as Administrator/Terminator; Hint 7: Avoid Legislative Votes; Hint 8: Do Not Encroach Upon Legislative Prerogatives; Hint 9: Accept Short-term Cost IncreasesHint 10: Buy Off the BeneficiariesHint 11: Advocate Adoption, Not Termination; Hint 12: Terminate Only What Is Necessary; Conclusion; 6. Evaluating Termination Research; Conclusions from Termination Research; 1. Termination Rarely Has Economic Justification; 2. Termination Is Highly Political and Hard to Achieve; 3. Termination Requires Cooptation of Opponents; 4. Termination Often Involves Changing Ideologies; 5. Termination Is Often Followed by Rebirth; 6. Successful Termination Is Difficult to Predict7. Termination Is an American Political Paradox: Everyone Supports It, Everyone Opposes ItConclusion; Notes; Bibliography; IndexThis text examines why and when policies or organizations are terminated, how they can be terminated successfully, and what often prevents them from being terminated. The literature on termination and a variety of case studies are reviewed in order to identify theories supported by research.Political planningUnited StatesEvaluationPolicy sciencesEvaluationPublic administrationUnited StatesEvaluationSunset reviews of government programsUnited StatesPolitical planningEvaluation.Policy sciencesEvaluation.Public administrationEvaluation.Sunset reviews of government programs320/.6/0973Daniels Mark Ross1952-1667282Roth William V.Jr.,MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910816802103321Terminating public programs4027019UNINA