03606nam 22007694a 450 991081602730332120200520144314.01-107-12383-61-280-43345-00-511-80543-80-511-17480-20-511-04171-30-511-15486-00-511-30240-10-511-04404-6(CKB)1000000000002296(EBL)202055(OCoLC)475916576(SSID)ssj0000142057(PQKBManifestationID)11130227(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000142057(PQKBWorkID)10090300(PQKB)10154024(UkCbUP)CR9780511805431(Au-PeEL)EBL202055(CaPaEBR)ebr10005733(CaONFJC)MIL43345(MiAaPQ)EBC202055(PPN)240831004(EXLCZ)99100000000000229620010104d2001 uy 0engur|||||||||||txtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierDynamics of contention /Douglas McAdam, Sidney Tarrow, Charles Tilly1st ed.Cambridge ;New York Cambridge University Press20011 online resource (xxi, 387 pages) digital, PDF file(s)Cambridge studies in contentious politicsTitle from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015).0-521-01187-6 0-521-80588-0 Includes bibliographical references (p. 349-370) and index.Cover; Half-title; Series-title; Title; Copyright; Dedication; Contents; List of Figures and Tables; Preface and Acknowledgments; Abbreviations; PART ONE What s the Problem?; PART TWO Tentative Solutions; PART THREE Applications and Conclusions; References; IndexIn recent decades the study of social movements, revolution, democratization and other non-routine politics has flourished. And yet research on the topic remains highly fragmented, reflecting the influence of at least three traditional divisions. The first of these reflects the view that various forms of contention are distinct and should be studied independent of others. Separate literatures have developed around the study of social movements, revolutions and industrial conflict. A second approach to the study of political contention denies the possibility of general theory in deference to a grounding in the temporal and spatial particulars of any given episode of contention. The study of contentious politics are left to 'area specialists' and/or historians with a thorough knowledge of the time and place in question. Finally, overlaid on these two divisions are stylized theoretical traditions - structuralist, culturalist, and rationalist - that have developed largely in isolation from one another. This book was first published in 2001.Cambridge studies in contentious politics.Collective behaviorSocial movementsRevolutionsDemocratizationCollective behavior.Social movements.Revolutions.Democratization.303.48/4McAdam Doug475689Tarrow Sidney G173226Tilly Charles122934MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910816027303321Dynamics of contention1246317UNINA