03764nam 22006491 450 991081599220332120110421143347.01-4725-6482-01-282-44444-197866124444491-84731-520-810.5040/9781472564825(CKB)2550000000002944(EBL)479810(OCoLC)586200107(SSID)ssj0000339124(PQKBManifestationID)12060421(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000339124(PQKBWorkID)10323056(PQKB)10052420(MiAaPQ)EBC1772761(MiAaPQ)EBC479810(Au-PeEL)EBL1772761(CaPaEBR)ebr10356641(CaONFJC)MIL244444(OCoLC)893332299(UtOrBLW)bpp09256437(Au-PeEL)EBL479810(EXLCZ)99255000000000294420140929d2009 uy 0engur|n|---|||||txtccrThe International Court of Justice and self-defence in international law /James A. Green1st ed.Oxford ;Portland, Oregon :Hart Publishing,2009.1 online resource (246 p.)Studies in international law ;v. 25Based on the author's thesis (Ph.D)--University of Nottingham, 2007.1-84113-876-2 Includes bibliographical references (pages [211]-225) and index.Introduction --The criterion of an armed attack in the jurisprudence of the International Court of Justice --The criteria of necessity and proportionality --The trouble with armed attack and the merged conceptions of self-defence --A proposal for redefining armed attack --The ICJ : roles and restrictions --Conclusion."The legal rules governing the use of force between States are one of the most fundamental, and the most controversial, aspects of international law. An essential part of this subject is the question of when, and to what extent, a State may lawfully use force against another in self-defence. However, the parameters of this inherent right remain obscure, despite the best efforts of scholars and, notably, the International Court of Justice. This book examines the burgeoning relationship between the ICJ and the right of self-defence. Since 2003 there have been three major decisions of the ICJ that have dealt directly with the law governing self-defence actions, in contrast to only two such cases in the preceding fifty years. This, then, is an opportune moment to reconsider the jurisprudence of the Court on this issue. This book is the first of its kind to comprehensively draw together and then assess the merits of this jurisprudence. It argues that the contribution of the ICJ has been confused and unhelpful, and compounds inadequacies in existing customary international law. The ICJ's fundamental conception of a primary criterion of 'armed attack' as constituting a qualitatively grave use of force is brought into question. The book then goes on to examine the underlying causes of the problems that have emerged in the jurisprudence on this crucial issue."--Bloomsbury Publishing.Studies in international law (Oxford, England) ;v. 25.Self-defense (International law)International lawSelf-defense (International law)341.62Green James A.1981-47361UtOrBLWUtOrBLWBOOK9910815992203321International court of justice and self-defence in international law1114126UNINA