03902nam 2200817 450 991081580200332120230120063927.00-8232-5414-30-8232-6111-50-8232-5413-50-8232-5412-710.1515/9780823254132(CKB)4390000000004147(StDuBDS)EDZ0000292564(OCoLC)867149739(MdBmJHUP)muse27541(DE-B1597)555481(DE-B1597)9780823254132(Au-PeEL)EBL3239859(CaPaEBR)ebr10790358(OCoLC)899045311(OCoLC)1178768983(Au-PeEL)EBL2033538(OCoLC)958513135(MiAaPQ)EBC3239859(MiAaPQ)EBC2033538(dli)HEB32067(MiU) MIU01100000000000000000021(EXLCZ)99439000000000414720130805d2014 uy 0engur|||||||||||rdacontentrdamediardacarrierAmbiguity and the absolute Nietzsche and Merleau-Ponty on the question of truth /Frank ChouraquiFirst edition.New York :Fordham University Press,2014.1 online resource (xviii, 304 pages)Perspectives in Continental PhilosophyPerspectives in continental philosophy0-8232-5411-9 Includes bibliographical references and index.Frontmatter -- Contents -- Abbreviations -- Preface -- Introduction -- 1 Nietzsche on Self-Differentiation and Genealogy -- 2 The Incorporation of Truth and the Symbiosis of Truth and Life -- 3 The Self-Becoming of the World and the Incompleteness of Being -- Transition: Vicious Circles, Virtuous Circles, and Meeting Merleau-Ponty in the Middle -- 4 The Origin of Truth -- 5 Existential Reduction and the Object of Truth -- 6 Merleau-Ponty’s “Soft” Ontology of Truth as Falsification -- Conclusion -- Notes -- Bibliography -- Index Friedrich Nietzsche and Maurice Merleau-Ponty, Chouraqui argues, are linked by how they conceive the question of truth. Although both thinkers criticize the traditional concept of truth as objectivity, they both find that rejecting it does not solve the problem. What is it in our natural existence that gave rise to the notion of truth?The answer to that question is threefold. First, Nietzsche and Merleau-Ponty both propose a genealogy of “truth” in which to exist means to make implicit truth claims. Second, both seek to recover the preobjective ground from which truth as an erroneous concept arose. Finally, this attempt at recovery leads both thinkers to ontological considerations regarding how we must conceive of a being whose structure allows for the existence of the belief in truth. In conclusion, Chouraqui suggests that both thinkers’ investigations of the question of truth lead them to conceive of being as the process of self-falsification by which indeterminate being presents itself as determinate.Perspectives in continental philosophy.Absolute, TheAmbiguityTruthDifference.Epoche.History.Incorporation.Merleau-Ponty.Nietzsche.Ontology.Phenomenological reduction.Sedimentation.Truth.Absolute, The.Ambiguity.Truth.121Chouraqui Frank790904MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910815802003321Ambiguity and the absolute1766878UNINA