04448nam 2200709 450 991081545820332120230808191930.0(CKB)3710000000609789(EBL)4441478(SSID)ssj0001624671(PQKBManifestationID)16362144(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001624671(PQKBWorkID)14863151(PQKB)11534154(PQKBManifestationID)16261628(PQKBWorkID)14863152(PQKB)23219518(MiAaPQ)EBC4441478(DLC) 2015050863(EXLCZ)99371000000060978920151222h20162016 uy| 0engur|n|---|||||txtccrMixing metaphor a descriptive and prescriptive analysis /edited by Raymond W. Gibbs, JrAmsterdam ;Philadelphia :John Benjamins Publishing Company,[2016]©20161 online resource (285 p.)Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication (MiLCC),2210-4836 ;6Description based upon print version of record.90-272-6750-2 90-272-0210-9 Includes bibliographical references and index.Mixing Metaphor; Editorial page; Title page; LCC data; Table of contents; Introduction; 1. Mixing metaphor in perspective; 2. Summary of the chapters; A view of "mixed metaphor" within a conceptual metaphor theory framework; 1.1 Introduction; 1.2 Some questions about mixed metaphors; 1.2.1 Why are imagistically incongruent metaphors selected at a particular point in discourse?; 1.2.2 Why are mixed metaphors so common?; 1.2.3 Why do we have cases of metaphorically entirely homogeneous discourse?; 1.2.4 Why are often widely divergent source domains inserted into discourse?2.3 Multiple metaphors in theory-building2.4 Conclusions; References; Why mixed metaphors make sense; 3.1 Introduction; 3.2 Why should mixing metaphors be problematic?; 3.3 Mixed metaphors foreground uncommon aspects of meaning; 3.4 Conclusion - A dynamic view on metaphors in language use; References; Tackling mixed metaphors in discourse; 4.1 Introduction; 4.2 Study 1; 4.2.1 Method; 4.2.2 Results; 4.3 Study 2; 4.3.1 Method; 4.3.1.1 Participants; 4.3.1.2 Materials and Procedure; 4.3.2 Results; 4.4 Conclusion; References; Appendix A; Mixed metaphor; 5.1 Introduction; 5.2 The ATT-Meta approach5.2.1 ATT-Meta's orientation and a quick example5.2.2 Fictionalist/pretence-based approach; 5.2.3 Metaphorical views and mappings in ATT-Meta; 5.2.4 The pretence-based nature of mappings; 5.2.5 Detail in a sub-persons example; 5.2.6 Ancillary assumptions; 5.2.7 View-neutral mapping adjuncts; 5.2.8 Goal-directed reasoning; 5.2.9 ATT-Meta and blending; 5.3 ATT-Meta and mixed metaphor; 5.3.1 The marigold example: Mixed form; 5.3.2 Deployment of pretence spaces, VNMAs and inference; 5.3.3 More on parallel mixing; 5.3.4 Combining different types of mixing5.3.5 Advantages that ATT-Meta brings to mixed metaphor5.4 Further discussion: Variability of analysis; 5.5 Conclusions; Acknowledgments; References; Mixed metaphor is a question of deliberateness; 6.1 Introduction; 6.2 Mixed metaphor and deliberateness; 6.3 Deliberate versus non-deliberate metaphor; 6.4 From deliberate to mixed metaphor; 6.5 Epilogue; References; When languages and cultures meet; 7.1 Introduction; 7.2 Metaphor and the learner of English; 7.3 Mixed, extended, and repeated metaphors in language learner discourse; 7.4 Discussion and conclusion; ReferencesThe 'dull roar' and the 'burning barbed wire pantyhose'Metaphor in language, cognition, and communication ;6.MetaphorPsychological aspectsMetaphorUsageCognitive grammarSemanticsConceptsThought and thinkingMetaphorPsychological aspects.MetaphorUsage.Cognitive grammar.Semantics.Concepts.Thought and thinking.808/.032Gibbs Raymond W.MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910815458203321Mixing metaphor4046063UNINA