02639nam 2200457 450 991081512300332120230822222029.090-04-32329-510.1163/9789004323292(CKB)3710000000932865(MiAaPQ)EBC47340862016044570(nllekb)BRILL9789004323292(EXLCZ)99371000000093286520160927d2016 uy 0engurcnu||||||||rdacontentrdamediardacarrierRule-formulation and binding precedent in the madhhab-law tradition Ibn Qutlubugha's commentary on the compendium of Quduri /Talal Al-AzemLeiden ;Boston :Brill,[2016]1 online resource (273 pages) illustrations (some color), graphsIslamicate intellectual history ;v. 290-04-32283-3 Includes bibliographical references and index.Front Matter -- Introduction -- Authors -- History -- Theory -- Practice -- Conclusion -- The Writings of Qudūrī -- Jurists Cited by Ibn Quṭlūbughā -- Works Cited by Ibn Quṭlūbughā -- Bibliography -- Index.In Rule-Formulation and Binding Precedent in the Madhhab-Law Tradition , Talal Al-Azem argues for the existence of a madhhab -law tradition’ of jurisprudence underpinning the four post-classical Sunni schools of law. This tradition celebrated polyvalence by preserving the multiplicity of conflicting opinions within each school, while simultaneously providing a process of rule formulation ( tarjīḥ ) by which one opinion is chosen as the binding precedent ( taqlīd ). The predominant forum of both activities, he shows, was the legal commentary. Through a careful reading of Ibn Quṭlūbughā's (d. 879/1474) al-Taṣḥīḥ wa-al-tarjīḥ , Al-Azem presents a new periodisation of the Ḥanafī madhhab , analyses the theory of rule formulation, and demonstrates how this madhhab -law tradition facilitated both continuity and legal change while serving as the basis of a pluralistic Mamluk judicial system.Islamicate Intellectual History2.Islamic lawInterpretation and constructionHanafitesIslamic lawInterpretation and construction.Hanafites.340.59Al-Azem Talal1689267NL-LeKBNL-LeKBBOOK9910815123003321Rule-formulation and binding precedent in the madhhab-law tradition4064197UNINA