05516nam 2200661 450 991081451310332120230807220112.094-6274-270-7(CKB)3710000000437788(EBL)2076759(SSID)ssj0001539982(PQKBManifestationID)11823656(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001539982(PQKBWorkID)11533458(PQKB)10790542(MiAaPQ)EBC2076759(Au-PeEL)EBL2076759(CaPaEBR)ebr11069260(CaONFJC)MIL819871(OCoLC)912278456(EXLCZ)99371000000043778820150706h20152015 uy| 0engur|n|---|||||txtccrThe presumption of non-conformity in European consumer sales law /Karolina Maria SikorskaThe Hague :Eleven International Publishing,[2015]©20151 online resource (400 p.)Description based upon print version of record.94-6236-557-1 Includes bibliographical references and index.Cover; Table of Contents; Abbreviations; 1 Introduction; 1.1 Research questions; 1.2 Approach; 2 Burden of proof; 2.1 Introduction; 2.1.1 Burden of proof - European perspective; 2.1.2 Functions of the burden of proof in the civil proceedings; 2.2 Burden of proof in Polish law; 2.2.1 Introduction; 2.2.2 Definitions; 2.2.2.1 Material aspect; 2.2.2.2 Procedural aspect; 2.2.3 Allocation of the burden of proof; 2.2.3.1 General rule of Article 6 of the Civil Code; 2.2.3.2 Presumptions; 2.2.4 Standard of proof; 2.2.5 Conclusions; 2.3 Burden of proof in German law; 2.3.1 Introduction2.3.2 Definitions2.3.2.1 Objektive Beweislast; 2.3.2.2 Subjektive Beweislast; I Abstract (subjective) burden of proof; II Relative (subjective) burden of proof; 2.3.3 Allocation of the burden of proof; 2.3.3.1 Normentheorie; 2.3.3.2 Presumptions; 2.3.4 Standard of proof; 2.3.5 Conclusions; 2.4 Burden of proof in English and Welsh law; 2.4.1 Introduction; 2.4.2 Definitions; 2.4.2.1 Persuasive burden; 2.4.2.2 Evidential burden; 2.4.3 Allocation of the burden of proof; 2.4.3.1 Allocation of the burden of persuasion; 2.4.3.2 Allocation of the evidential burden; 2.4.3.3 Presumptions2.4.4 Standard of proof2.4.5 Conclusions; 2.5 Burden of proof in Dutch law; 2.5.1 Introduction; 2.5.2 Definitions; 2.5.3 Allocation of the burden of proof; 2.5.3.1 General rule of Article 150 Rv; 2.5.3.2 Presumptions; 2.5.4 Standard of proof; 2.5.5 Conclusions; 2.6 Conclusions; 3 Consumer Sales Directive and its national implementations; 3.1 Introduction; 3.2 Information about the Consumer Sales Directive; 3.2.1 Legislative process; 3.2.2 Objectives; 3.2.3 Implementation methods; 3.3 Consumer sale in Polish law; 3.3.1 General information; 3.3.1.1 Method of implementation3.3.1.2 Characterisation of the implementing act3.3.1.3 Systematics of sales law; 3.3.2 Legislative changes as a result of the implementation of the Consumer Sales Directive; 3.3.3 Current issues regarding the law of consumer sale; 3.3.3.1 Implementation of the Directive on Consumer Rights; 3.3.3.2 Existence of the case law; 3.3.3.3 ADR; 3.3.3.4 Consequences for consumer protection; 3.3.4 Conclusions; 3.4 Consumer sale in German law; 3.4.1 General information; 3.4.1.1 Method of implementation; 3.4.1.2 Characterisation of the implementing act; 3.4.1.3 Systematics of sales law3.4.2 Legislative changes as a result of the implementation of the Consumer Sales Directive3.4.3 Current issues regarding the law of consumer sale; 3.4.3.1 Implementation of the Directive on Consumer Rights; 3.4.3.2 Interpretation of German provisions on consumer sales in conformity with the Directive; 3.4.3.3 ADR; 3.4.4 Conclusions; 3.5 Consumer sale in English and Welsh law; 3.5.1 General information; 3.5.1.1 Method of implementation; 3.5.1.2 Characterisation of the implementing act; 3.5.1.3 Systematics of sales law3.5.2 Legislative changes as a result of the implementation of the Consumer Sales DirectiveThis book analyzes the allocation of the burden of proof in European consumer sale cases, in particular the application of the presumption of non-conformity designed to simplify the consumer's duty to supply evidence. It provides detailed information on the notion of non-conformity as found in the Consumer Sales Directive and implemented in Poland, Germany, England/Wales, and the Netherlands, and it presents a comprehensive analysis of the presumption of non-conformity. The book clarifies whether the presumption of non-conformity constitutes an appropriate tool for simplifying the burden of prSalesEuropean Union countriesLawEuropean Union countriesInternational unificationConsumer protectionLaw and legislationEuropean Union countriesEuropefastEuropäische UniongndSalesLawInternational unification.Consumer protectionLaw and legislation349.497Sikorska Karolina1604002MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910814513103321The presumption of non-conformity in European consumer sales law3928628UNINA